CVE-2026-63795

CRITICALPre-NVD 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 10.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-19. a secondary CVSS source baseline 10.0; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 10.0Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

9p: avoid putting oldfid in p9_client_walk() error path

When p9_client_walk() is called with clone set to false, fid aliases oldfid. If the walk subsequently fails after the request has been sent, the error path jumps to clunk_fid, which currently calls p9_fid_put(fid) unconditionally.

This drops a reference to oldfid even though ownership of oldfid remains with the caller. If this is the last reference, oldfid can be clunked and destroyed while the caller still expects it to be valid. A later use or put of oldfid can then trigger a use-after-free or refcount underflow.

Fix this by only putting fid in the clunk_fid error path when it does not alias oldfid, matching the existing guard in the error path below.

This can be triggered when a multi-component walk is split into multiple p9_client_walk() calls and a later non-cloning walk fails. A reproducer and refcount warning logs are available on request.

CVSS v3
10.0
EG Score
10.0(medium)
EG Risk
50(Track)
EG Risk 50/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity100% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
41%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Aug 24, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

9p: avoid putting oldfid in p9_client_walk() error path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b84f46179c806450b89821221ea5bd9a1698aba8
generic

9p: avoid putting oldfid in p9_client_walk() error path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7656d368265d085ac9bb85ab31b0cdb72ad8c38
generic

9p: avoid putting oldfid in p9_client_walk() error path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a61bdcba4f64c2f90d01461913f429ab151f1ca6
generic

9p: avoid putting oldfid in p9_client_walk() error path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/99c379ca1e221c3d75c7c804ebbf4e5ee37a3070
generic

9p: avoid putting oldfid in p9_client_walk() error path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6dbe9443d9f5f7fb6d319a7b77108853ae6c6bea
generic

9p: avoid putting oldfid in p9_client_walk() error path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a3860d46e3eb47dbd60339783cdad7904486b9f

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63795(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.176-1~deb11u1 (21 versions)6.1.177-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (54 versions)6.1.177-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (29 versions)6.12.95-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (153 versions)7.1.3-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 65× in last 7d / 299× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 365 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 06:44 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-30 06:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-30 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-30 03:03 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-30 03:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-28 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-28 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-27 21:25 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-27 21:25 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-27 21:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-27 11:59 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-27 11:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-27 02:10 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-27 02:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-26 22:29 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-26 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-26 22:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-26 11:46 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-26 11:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-26 07:25 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-26 07:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-26 02:27 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-26 02:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-25 22:46 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-25 22:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-25 18:49 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-25 18:49 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-25 18:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-25 13:39 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-25 13:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-25 09:58 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-25 09:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-25 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-25 06:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-25 02:36 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-25 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-24 22:52 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-24 22:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-24 19:11 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-24 19:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-24 15:12 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-24 15:12 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-24 15:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-24 11:30 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-24 11:30 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-24 11:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-24 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-24 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-24 04:00 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-24 04:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-24 00:19 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-24 00:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-23 20:38 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-23 20:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-23 16:57 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-23 16:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-23 13:16 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-23 13:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-23 09:19 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-23 09:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-23 05:39 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-23 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-23 01:57 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-23 01:57 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-23 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-22 22:17 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-22 22:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-22 18:36 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-22 18:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-22 14:55 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-22 14:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-22 11:14 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-22 11:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-22 07:33 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-22 07:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-22 03:52 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-22 03:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-22 00:10 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-22 00:10 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-22 00:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-08-21 20:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-21 16:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-21 13:05 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-21 13:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-21 09:19 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-21 09:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-21 05:38 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-21 05:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-21 01:57 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-21 01:57 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-21 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-08-20 22:14 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63795?
CVE-2026-63795 is a critical vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: 9p: avoid putting oldfid in p9clientwalk() error path When p9clientwalk() is called with clone set to false, fid aliases oldfid. If the walk subsequently fails after the request has been sent, the error path jumps to clunkfid,…
When was CVE-2026-63795 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63795 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63795 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63795 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 59.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63795?
CVE-2026-63795 has a CVSS v3 base score of 10.0 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63795?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63795, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63795

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63795?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.