Valkey is a distributed key-value database. Prior to 7.2.14, 8.0.10, 8.1.9, 9.0.5, and 9.1.1, Valkey's RESTORE command accepts a malformed RDB stream payload that assigns one Pending Entry List NACK to multiple consumers during stream consumer-group deserialization, causing a use-after-free when one consumer is deleted while another still references the shared NACK and potentially allowing remote code execution. This issue is fixed in versions 7.2.14, 8.0.10, 8.1.9, 9.0.5, and 9.1.1.
CVE-2026-63639
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 1.2% (66th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 8.8HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 40EG Risk 40/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity88% × 45%The EG Score, 8.8 of 10.Exploitation1.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 1.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 66th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 18, 2026
Last Modified
September 18, 2026
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Aug 18, 20268.1.9
Patch available: valkey-io/valkey 8.1.9
https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/releases/tag/8.1.98.0.10
Patch available: valkey-io/valkey 8.0.10
https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/releases/tag/8.0.107.2.14
Patch available: valkey-io/valkey 7.2.14
https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/releases/tag/7.2.14commit f8d2027e8d4d (valkey-io/valkey)
Patch available: valkey-io/valkey 8.0.10 (contains commit f8d2027e8d4d)
https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/commit/f8d2027e8d4df790ac04974bf606408c8ea62778commit e95911d4d65b (valkey-io/valkey)
Patch available: valkey-io/valkey 7.2.14 (contains commit e95911d4d65b)
https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/commit/e95911d4d65be8789fa3705f44d7ed1e65378445commit 98465eaffe3f (valkey-io/valkey)
Patch available: valkey-io/valkey 8.1.9 (contains commit 98465eaffe3f)
https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/commit/98465eaffe3f95524a5046318bfbc4bdb9798291commit 509cb3c74e8c (valkey-io/valkey)
Patch available: valkey-io/valkey 9.1.1 (contains commit 509cb3c74e8c)
https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/commit/509cb3c74e8cbc9c0498ebe8b6c93dcd605e7271commit 06bc7768fe60 (valkey-io/valkey)
Patch available: valkey-io/valkey 9.0.5 (contains commit 06bc7768fe60)
https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/commit/06bc7768fe609f2054e69ccedefe7628f5675da9Reject corrupt stream RDB with shared NACK across consumers (CVE-2026-63639)
Fix merged in valkey-io/valkey PR #4073 on 2026-06-30 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/pull/4073UAF in stream deserialization may lead to remote code execution · Advisory · valkey-io/valkey · GitHub
https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/security/advisories/GHSA-mvcj-73cw-22m4Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63639(5)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:68601Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: valkey security update
- RHSA-2026:64807Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: valkey security, bug fix, and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:64796Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: valkey security, bug fix, and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:61884Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- CVE-2026-63639Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)High
Valkey: UAF in stream deserialization may lead to remote code execution
Patch Availability(5)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | valkey-tools (9.0.4-0ubuntu0.2) @ resolute | 2026-10-13 | ubuntu |
| redhat | valkey-0:8.0.11-1.el10_0 | 2026-09-17 | redhat |
| redhat | valkey-0:8.0.11-1.el10_2 | 2026-09-08 | redhat |
| redhat | valkey-0:8.0.10-1.el9_8 | 2026-09-08 | redhat |
| redhat | valkey-main-9.0.6-0.1.hum1 | 2026-09-01 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:14(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| redict | 7.3.0+ds-1 ... 7.3.6+ds-3 (16 versions) |
| — |
| valkey | 8.1.1+dfsg1-3, 8.1.4+dfsg1-1, 8.1.4+dfsg1-2 |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| valkey | 8.1.1+dfsg1-3 ... 9.1.2-1 (7 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(1)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 82× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 143 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 43 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-13 11:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 11:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-07 11:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 21:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 21:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-06 08:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 08:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-05 11:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 11:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-04 21:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 06:18 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-03 17:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 17:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-02 15:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 01:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-10-01 11:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 22:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 22:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-09-30 09:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 09:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 22:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 22:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-09-28 09:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 21:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 21:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 07:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 07:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 66th percentile
- 2026-09-25 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 01:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 08:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 20:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 20:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-23 04:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 04:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 15:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 03:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 03:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-21 14:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-21 01:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 01:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-20 12:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 23:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 23:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 10:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 20:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-18 10:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 21:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 21:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 03:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 15:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 15:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-16 01:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 12:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 12:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 00:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 11:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 22:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 22:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 10:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 21:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 21:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 08:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 20:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-11 07:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 18:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 18:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 05:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 17:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 03:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 03:26 UTCVendor advisory
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:14:redict
Same vendor
5 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:61884 · redhat:RHSA-2026:64796 · ubuntu:USN-8771-1
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-63639?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-63639 published?
Is CVE-2026-63639 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63639?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63639?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63639
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63639?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.