Memory allocation with excessive size value in the DTLS handshake reassembly (DtlsReliableHandshake, DtlsReassembler) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote unauthenticated DTLS peer to cause a denial of service through memory exhaustion via crafted handshake message fragments, because the reassembly buffer for each incoming handshake message was allocated at the 24-bit length declared in the fragment header, without the check against the peer's maximum handshake message size that TLS already applied. A fragment carrying no payload can force an allocation of almost 16 MB, for each of up to 16 pending messages per handshake, before the handshake is authenticated. DTLS servers and DTLS clients are both affected; TLS is not.
CVE-2026-63566
This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (28th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.7
- EG Score
- 8.7HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 54EG Risk 54/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity87% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high until it ships, then apply the release. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 28th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high until it ships, then apply the release.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
October 2, 2026
Last Modified
October 2, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 2, 2026commit 99afef612458 (bcgit/bc-csharp)
Fix landed in bcgit/bc-csharp commit 99afef612458 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/commit/99afef612458f70f28e7824a09719bfc3a169bdacommit 212d06474166 (bcgit/bc-csharp)
Fix landed in bcgit/bc-csharp commit 212d06474166 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/commit/212d06474166d5e85be72c2dd4898313aa5dd5f3Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63566(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 18× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 04:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 17:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 17:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 05:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 14:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 07:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 07:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 07:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-63566?
When was CVE-2026-63566 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-63566 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63566?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63566?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-63566
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63566?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.