libheif is a HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder. In 1.23.0 and earlier, a crafted HEIF or AVIF file containing a clean aperture box can reduce an image dimension to zero and crash or corrupt tiling results when heif_image_handle_get_image_tiling(handle, 1, &tiling) is called. ImageItem::get_heif_image_tiling() returns already transformed dimensions, and process_image_transformations_on_tiling() applies the clean aperture transformation again. The second application passes zero to Box_clap::left_rounded(0), where image_width minus one underflows and constructs Fraction(0xFFFFFFFF, 2). Debug builds reach an assertion and abort, while release builds can return a corrupt crop and zero-width tiling result. The affected implementation spans libheif/image-items/image_item.cc, libheif/context.cc, and libheif/box.cc. This issue is fixed in version 1.23.1.
CVE-2026-62289
This medium-severity CVE scores 4.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 78% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 4.3
- EG Score
- 4.3(medium)
- EG Risk
- 19(Track)EG Risk 19/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity43% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 22%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 18, 2026
Last Modified
August 19, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Aug 18, 2026Integer underflow in Fraction constructor via double clap transform application (CWE-190/617) · Advisory · strukturag/libheif · GitHub
Affected: v1.23.0 (latest). Verified against 10+ related Fraction/clap commits including
https://github.com/strukturag/libheif/security/advisories/GHSA-jc8f-p23p-5hjgv1.23.1
Patch available: strukturag/libheif v1.23.1
https://github.com/strukturag/libheif/releases/tag/v1.23.1commit f01870c1d732 (strukturag/libheif)
Patch available: strukturag/libheif v1.23.1 (contains commit f01870c1d732)
https://github.com/strukturag/libheif/commit/f01870c1d7323a3003796d58eba7fff502be994cPatch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | libheif1 (1.21.2-3ubuntu0.4) @ resolute | 2026-08-26 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(1)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 07:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 07:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 09:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 09:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 10:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 11:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 11:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-22 13:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 13:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 14:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 14:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 16:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 22:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
Show 1 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-18 21:23 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownubuntu
- CVE-2004-0989EG 10.0EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2004-0990EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2004-1010EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2004-0941EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2004-0981EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2004-0882EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2004-0888EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2004-1012EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2004-1013EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2004-1018EG 10.0EPSS p97HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-191
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-62289?
When was CVE-2026-62289 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-62289 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-62289?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-62289?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-62289
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-62289?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.