Wazuh is an open-source security platform providing unified XDR and SIEM protection for endpoints and cloud workloads. In versions 4.14.0 through 4.14.6, an authenticated low-privilege user can read the cluster secret from the manager configuration because the logic that masks sensitive values is disabled by any update-config RBAC rule, including an explicit deny. The mask_sensitive_config() decorator applies masking only when _has_update_permissions() returns false, but that gate treats a user as able to update the config whenever a manager:update_config or cluster:update_config rule exists, without ever checking whether the rule's effect is allow or deny. Because a deny rule is stored as a real entry, a read-only account that is hardened by explicitly denying config edits is counted as having update permission, which turns masking off. A single authenticated GET request to the configuration endpoint with raw=true then returns the verbatim ossec.conf XML with cluster.key in clear, whereas an otherwise identical account without the deny rule sees the value masked. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.7.
CVE-2026-61783
This high-severity CVE scores 7.0 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 85% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.0
- EG Score
- 7.0(medium)
- EG Risk
- 48(Track)EG Risk 48/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity70% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 15%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 27, 2026
Last Modified
August 28, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 27, 2026commit 939f2e52afff (wazuh/wazuh)
Patch available: wazuh/wazuh v5.0.0-beta3 (contains commit 939f2e52afff)
https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/commit/939f2e52afff8fbeb7b0894f3f1417eb6c395db3RBAC permission-effect check in mask_sensitive_config allows low-privilege users to read cluster.key · Advisory · wazuh/wazuh · GitHub
https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/security/advisories/GHSA-vjcq-cf36-f5gxWeakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 9× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-30 01:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 03:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 15:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 00:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 23:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 23:22 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-61783?
When was CVE-2026-61783 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-61783 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-61783?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-61783?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-61783
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-61783?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.