DIRAC is an interware, meaning a software framework for distributed computing. Prior to versions 8.0.79, 9.0.22, and 9.1.10, DataManagementSystem/Service/FileCatalogHandler.py checkDataset forwards an authenticated caller-controlled datasets value to DatasetManager.py __checkDataset, where datasetName is interpolated into an FC_MetaDatasets SQL query without parameterization. The injected query can control the returned MetaQuery value, which is passed to Python eval and permits command execution as the account running the DIRAC services. Successful exploitation can expose dirac.cfg, database passwords, stored proxies, and tokens, fully compromise the DIRAC system, and allow alteration of local log evidence. This issue is fixed in versions 8.0.79, 9.0.22, and 9.1.10.
CVE-2026-61667
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 1.2% (67th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.9
- EG Score
- 9.9CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 45EG Risk 45/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity99% × 45%The EG Score, 9.9 of 10.Exploitation1.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 1.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 67th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 13, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026RCE in FileCatalog DatasetManager via SQL injection + eval · Advisory · DIRACGrid/DIRAC · GitHub
https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/security/advisories/GHSA-m4m7-4cw8-62j6Release v9.1.10 (DIRACGrid/DIRAC)
Patch available: DIRACGrid/DIRAC v9.1.10
https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/releases/tag/v9.1.10Release v9.0.22 (DIRACGrid/DIRAC)
Patch available: DIRACGrid/DIRAC v9.0.22
https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/releases/tag/v9.0.22Release v8.0.79 (DIRACGrid/DIRAC)
Patch available: DIRACGrid/DIRAC v8.0.79
https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/releases/tag/v8.0.79commit fabf08a4a403 (DIRACGrid/DIRAC)
Patch available: DIRACGrid/DIRAC v8.0.79 (contains commit fabf08a4a403)
https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/commit/fabf08a4a403fdd92d3445771528fa54b3ee902fcommit 6f6fe65f27b6 (DIRACGrid/DIRAC)
Patch available: DIRACGrid/DIRAC v9.0.22 (contains commit 6f6fe65f27b6)
https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/commit/6f6fe65f27b6913916ef77a77a09918b94029c0acommit 66cfc8bf1dc1 (DIRACGrid/DIRAC)
Patch available: DIRACGrid/DIRAC v9.1.10 (contains commit 66cfc8bf1dc1)
https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/commit/66cfc8bf1dc13a6d38bf0c5654d5b551d76dce9bcommit 5a5def88d65a (DIRACGrid/DIRAC)
Patch available: DIRACGrid/DIRAC v9.0.22 (contains commit 5a5def88d65a)
https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/commit/5a5def88d65a18c77af9f2900ffb5866d6489d62commit 55ecbd729242 (DIRACGrid/DIRAC)
Patch available: DIRACGrid/DIRAC v9.1.10 (contains commit 55ecbd729242)
https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/commit/55ecbd729242ddbe06251b57895873cc468f5a1acommit 106f6efb40eb (DIRACGrid/DIRAC)
Patch available: DIRACGrid/DIRAC v8.0.79 (contains commit 106f6efb40eb)
https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/commit/106f6efb40eb7318473fc09fc48083f1f864460aVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-61667(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| dirac | 7.2.0 ... 9.1.9 (336 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-14 09:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-13 05:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-09-30 18:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-09-28 09:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
- 2026-09-24 10:04 UTCEG score recompute
Show 13 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-23 04:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-18 05:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-15 19:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 18:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 18:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-30 09:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 11:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 03:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-13 19:08 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
4 shownPyPI:dirac
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-61667?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-61667 published?
Is CVE-2026-61667 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-61667?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-61667?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-61667
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-61667?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.