Monsta FTP before 2.14.5 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the fetchRemoteFile action caused by an incomplete IP blocklist check in the isBlockedIP() function, which fails to detect embedded IPv4 addresses within IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses. An unauthenticated attacker can obtain a CSRF token from the public getSystemVars endpoint and submit a fetchRemoteFile request with a source URL resolving to an IPv4-mapped address, causing the server to issue HTTP requests to internal services and write responses to an attacker-controlled FTP destination, enabling retrieval of cloud instance metadata credentials.
CVE-2026-60105
Score 8.6 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-08. a secondary CVSS source baseline 8.6; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 8.6
- EG Score
- 8.6(high)
- EPSS
- 22.6%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 8, 2026
Last Modified
July 10, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Jul 8, 2026Monsta FTP < 2.14.5 SSRF via IPv4-Mapped IPv6 Address Bypass | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/monsta-ftp-ssrf-via-ipv4-mapped-ipv6-address-bypassVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-60105(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 32× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-14 01:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-14 01:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-13 22:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-13 14:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 02:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-13 02:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-12 15:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-12 15:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 04:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-12 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-11 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-11 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 05:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-11 05:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-10 18:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-10 18:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-10 07:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-10 07:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-09 19:46 UTCEG score recompute
Show 7 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-09 19:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 08:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-09 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-08 21:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-08 21:10 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-918
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-60105?
When was CVE-2026-60105 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-60105 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-60105?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-60105?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-60105
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-60105?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.