Tracecat is an open-source security automation platform for teams and AI agents. From version 0.37.0 until 1.0.0-beta.49, Docker Compose deployments with SAML enabled can render SAML_SIGNED_ASSERTIONS and SAML_SIGNED_RESPONSES as empty values, overriding secure application defaults and disabling both signature requirements. An unauthenticated attacker who can reach the SAML assertion consumer endpoint can submit a forged unsigned response for an existing Tracecat user email address and obtain that user’s session. Targeting an existing superadmin can result in superadmin account takeover. Exploitation does not create users when SAML user creation is disabled and does not affect default Fargate or Helm deployments. Version 1.0.0-beta.49 removes the insecure deployment pass-through and requires signed assertions and responses.
CVE-2026-58490
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (27th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-118485 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 44EG Risk 44/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.3% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 27th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-07). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
November 6, 2026
Last Modified
November 6, 2026
Advisory Details (8)
Auto-updated Nov 6, 2026Unsigned SAML response accepted in Docker Compose SAML deployments due to empty signing defaults · Advisory · TracecatHQ/tracecat · GitHub
https://github.com/TracecatHQ/tracecat/security/advisories/GHSA-6g53-h6fh-c3pjTracecat 1.0.0-beta.49
Patch available: TracecatHQ/tracecat 1.0.0-beta.49
https://github.com/TracecatHQ/tracecat/releases/tag/1.0.0-beta.49chore(auth): hardcode require signed saml responses
Patch available: TracecatHQ/tracecat 1.1.0-alpha.11 (PR #2826 merged 2026-06-06)
https://github.com/TracecatHQ/tracecat/pull/2826fix(auth): harden SAML deployment defaults
Patch available: TracecatHQ/tracecat 1.1.0-alpha.11 (PR #2825 merged 2026-06-06)
https://github.com/TracecatHQ/tracecat/pull/2825fix(auth): secure SAML signing defaults
Patch available: TracecatHQ/tracecat 1.1.0-alpha.11 (PR #2824 merged 2026-06-05)
https://github.com/TracecatHQ/tracecat/pull/2824commit dab64eb7ac0e (TracecatHQ/tracecat)
Patch available: TracecatHQ/tracecat 1.1.0-alpha.11 (contains commit dab64eb7ac0e)
https://github.com/TracecatHQ/tracecat/commit/dab64eb7ac0eb2088783ca14f4cb2d058547bfffcommit a97aafbfd667 (TracecatHQ/tracecat)
Patch available: TracecatHQ/tracecat 1.1.0-alpha.11 (contains commit a97aafbfd667)
https://github.com/TracecatHQ/tracecat/commit/a97aafbfd667a6b9a3b7b524e1c1bfa9d8c59779commit 018258ba6a17 (TracecatHQ/tracecat)
Patch available: TracecatHQ/tracecat 1.1.0-alpha.11 (contains commit 018258ba6a17)
https://github.com/TracecatHQ/tracecat/commit/018258ba6a17c36cbfa7ca977526c34fb6afc35fWeakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 6× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-07 19:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
- 2026-11-06 21:04 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-118485 · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-11-06 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-06 20:13 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 9.8 CRITICAL
- 2026-11-06 20:12 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-58490?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-58490 published?
Is CVE-2026-58490 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-58490?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-58490?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-58490
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-58490?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.