AgenticMail gives AI agents real email addresses and phone numbers. In @agenticmail/claudecode prior to version 0.2.39, @agenticmail/codex prior to version 0.1.33, @agenticmail/core prior to version 0.9.43, and @agenticmail/openclaw prior to version 0.5.71, two inbound-mail handlers act on a privileged effect without verifying that the sender is the operator, while a sibling handler in the same repo does. The higher-impact one: any external email routed to the bridge inbox causes the dispatcher to resume the operator's Claude Code session with permissionMode: 'bypassPermissions', embedding the attacker-controlled from/subject/preview verbatim into the prompt the resumed agent reads — an indirect prompt injection into a fully-privileged agent (Bash/Write/Edit/WebFetch + the agenticmail MCP toolbelt) running as the operator's OAuth identity. The sibling operator-query email-reply hook gates the same untrusted-From provenance with isOperatorReplySender(replyFrom, config.operatorEmail) (fail-closed); the bridge-wake path — a strictly higher-privilege effect — has no equivalent. @agenticmail/claudecode 0.2.39, @agenticmail/codex 0.1.33, @agenticmail/core 0.9.43, and @agenticmail/openclaw 0.5.71 contain a fix.
CVE-2026-57495
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.2 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (29th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-46124 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-fq4x-789w-jg5h (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.2
- EG Score
- 8.2HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 52EG Risk 52/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity82% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 29th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.2): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.2 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.2 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 20, 2026
Last Modified
July 23, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Jul 20, 2026Unauthenticated inbound mail triggers bypassPermissions resume of the operator's Claude Code session (bridge-wake) with no sender gate, while the sibling operator-query hook authenticates the sender (CWE-306) · Advisory · agenticmail/agenticmail · GitHub
https://github.com/agenticmail/agenticmail/security/advisories/GHSA-fq4x-789w-jg5hVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-57495(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(4 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(4)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| @agenticmail/claudecode | — |
| — |
| @agenticmail/codex | — |
| — |
| @agenticmail/core | — |
| — |
| @agenticmail/openclaw | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 160 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 60 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-23 17:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-16 15:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-10-04 14:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-10-01 07:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-28 06:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-24 03:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-23 01:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-19 00:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-18 03:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-17 05:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-16 12:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-14 03:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-13 03:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 21:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-09 11:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-07 22:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-05 21:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-02 01:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-31 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-30 02:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-08-27 23:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-26 21:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-25 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-08-24 20:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 09:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-08-22 09:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-08-21 10:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-08-19 22:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-08-18 21:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-08-17 21:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-57495?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-57495 published?
Is CVE-2026-57495 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57495?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57495?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-57495
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57495?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.