Discourse Doc Categories is a plugin for organizing Discourse topics as documentation. Prior to the verified source fix, the doc category index refresh resolves linked titles for private messages or restricted category topics without enforcing the viewer's authorization. A user who can edit the index topic can use this behavior to learn titles that the user is not authorized to view, although the advisory does not establish access to topic contents. This vulnerability is addressed by commit b15d4de02ad29d7c9525346afee51fef4a2c605a.
CVE-2026-57447
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This medium-severity CVE scores 4.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (7th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-102926 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 4.3
- EG Score
- 4.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 19EG Risk 19/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity43% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system within your standard update timelines, and watch for a fix. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 7th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (4.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 4.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system within your standard update timelines, and watch for a fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 16, 2026
Last Modified
October 16, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 16, 2026commit b15d4de02ad2 (discourse/discourse-doc-categories)
Fix landed in discourse/discourse-doc-categories commit b15d4de02ad2 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/discourse/discourse-doc-categories/commit/b15d4de02ad29d7c9525346afee51fef4a2c605aDoc category index refresh leaks private topic titles · Advisory · discourse/discourse-doc-categories · GitHub
https://github.com/discourse/discourse-doc-categories/security/advisories/GHSA-x63p-48vw-8r64Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 17× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-22 21:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-16 18:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 15:39 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 4.3 MEDIUM
- 2026-10-16 15:38 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-57447?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-57447 published?
Is CVE-2026-57447 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57447?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57447?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-57447
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57447?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.