plone.app.portlets.portlets provides a Plone-specific user interface for plone.portlets, as well as a standard set of portlets that ship with Plone. Starting in version 5.0.0 and prior to versions 5.0.8, 6.0.4, and 7.0.2, the Classic portlet (plone.app.portlets.portlets.classic) used its user-supplied template/macro fields to build a TALES path expression that was then evaluated by the TAL path() helper. Because the value was interpreted as a full TALES expression, a user able to add or edit a Classic portlet could supply a crafted value that escapes simple path traversal and is evaluated as arbitrary code. This is exploitable by any authenticated user who can configure a Classic portlet - which, with the default role map, includes regular users on their personal dashboard. The result is code execution in the context of the Plone process, i.e. a privilege escalation across the trust boundary between an authenticated web user and the server-side process. The problem has been patched in plone.app.portlets 5.0.8, 6.0.4, and 7.0.2. Some workarounds are available. Restrict who can manage portlets: remove the plone.app.portlets.ManageOwnPortlets permission from untrusted roles, and limit Manage portlets to trusted administrators (usually this is already restricted to the Manager and Site Administrator roles). Where the Classic portlet is not needed, unregister it so it cannot be added. This would need to be done by editing a portlets.xml in your own code. One may also effectively disable showing the classic portlet by customising its template. In the Zope Management Interface go to the portal_view_customizations tool, locate the classic.pt template and click it. Click the Customize button. Remove all text and replace it with The classic portlet was disabled.. (This is not a recommended way of customizing a template, but in this case it is quite effective.)
CVE-2026-57149
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6%, top 51% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 9.9
- EG Score
- 9.9(medium)
- EG Risk
- 45(Track)EG Risk 45/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity99% × 45%Exploitation1% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 49%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 22, 2026
Last Modified
September 23, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Sep 23, 2026Remote Code Execution via TALES Injection · Advisory · plone/plone.app.portlets · GitHub
https://github.com/plone/plone.app.portlets/security/advisories/GHSA-rr49-f9g6-c9r5Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-57149(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| plone-app-portlets | 7.0.0, 7.0.1 | 7.0.2 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 6× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-23 18:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-22 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 19:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 19:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 19:08 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-95
- CVE-2026-61539EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-44643EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-28505EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2025-68271EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2025-54322EG 10.0EPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-2025-55728EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2025-55727EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2013-10070EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-31996EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-31982EG 10.0EPSS p98CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-57149?
When was CVE-2026-57149 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-57149 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57149?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57149?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-57149
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57149?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.