CVE-2026-57126

HIGHPre-NVD 8.58.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 8.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (31st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-77542 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-vxgj-xg5c-p4h7 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 8.5Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to praisonaiagents 1.6.58, SpiderTools._validate_url calls _host_is_blocked, which checks literal host encodings but does not resolve DNS names before scrape_page, crawl, extract_links, extract_text, or URL-mention fetches connect. An attacker-controlled hostname resolving to a loopback, private, link-local, or cloud-metadata address therefore bypasses the SSRF policy without a rebinding race and can expose internal responses to the agent. This issue is fixed in praisonaiagents 1.6.58.

CVSS v3
8.5
EG Score
8.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
54
EG Risk 54/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity85% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
31st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 18, 2026

Last Modified

September 15, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 14, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub release Patch Available

PraisonAI v4.6.58

Patch available: MervinPraison/PraisonAI v4.6.58

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/releases/tag/v4.6.58
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 2f9677abb2ea (MervinPraison/PraisonAI)

Patch available: MervinPraison/PraisonAI v4.6.143 (contains commit 2f9677abb2ea)

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit/2f9677abb2ea68eab864ee8b6a828fd0141612e1
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

praisonaiagents: SSRF guard validates literal IPs only and never resolves DNS (CWE-918) · Advisory · MervinPraison/PraisonAI · GitHub

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-vxgj-xg5c-p4h7

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-57126(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
praisonaiagents0.0.1 ... 1.6.9 (586 versions)
  • every version up to 1.6.59: fixed in 1.6.59
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  2. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  6. 2026-10-23 21:00 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  8. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  9. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  10. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  11. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  12. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  13. 2026-10-18 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  15. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  16. 2026-10-16 15:20 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  18. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  19. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  20. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  21. 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-11 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-11 16:53 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
Show 30 more
  1. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  2. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  3. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  4. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  5. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  6. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  7. 2026-10-05 07:18 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  9. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  10. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  11. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  12. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  13. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  14. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  15. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  16. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  17. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  18. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  19. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  20. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  21. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  22. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  23. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  24. 2026-09-14 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-14 19:30 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-14 15:22 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-07-30 22:31 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-07-26 18:46 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-07-23 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-07-20 21:34 UTCEG score recompute

Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-57126?
CVE-2026-57126 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 18, 2026. PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to praisonaiagents 1.6.58, SpiderTools.validateurl calls hostisblocked, which checks literal host encodings but does not resolve DNS names before scrapepage, crawl, extractlinks, extracttext, or URL-mention fetches connect. An attacker-controlled…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-57126 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-57126 was published on June 18, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-57126 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-57126 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (31st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57126?
CVE-2026-57126 has a CVSS base score of 8.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57126?
A fix for CVE-2026-57126 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-57126 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-57126

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57126?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Book a Demo →Browse All CVEs