CVE-2026-56826

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.45.4
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.4 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m
5.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: —CVSS: 5.4Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Shopping privilege escalation through missing authorization in Settings components

Summary

Four Livewire components in the Settings area expose destructive Filament actions (delete / edit) that perform no server-side authorization. Any authenticated user who can reach the Settings pages — i.e. holding only the coarse access_setting permission, without being an admin and without any delete_*/edit_* permission — can delete tax zones, tax rates, shipping zones, and carrier (shipping-rate) options by invoking the component action directly over the Livewire endpoint.

These records sit on the storefront checkout path, so deleting them breaks shipping-rate calculation, removes region-scoped payment methods, and corrupts tax resolution at checkout.

This is inconsistent with the rest of the admin, where destructive actions are gated by granular permissions (e.g. Settings/Locations/Index uses ->authorize('delete_inventories'), and Order/Detail gates mutating actions with edit_orders).

Affected components

| Component | File | Unauthorized action | |---|---|---| | Settings\Zones\ZoneShippingOptions | packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Settings/Zones/ZoneShippingOptions.php:47 | delete → CarrierOption::query()->find($arguments['id'])->delete() (id is client-supplied) | | Settings\Zones\Detail | packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Settings/Zones/Detail.php:46 | delete → DeleteAction on the bound Zone | | Settings\Taxes\Detail | packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Settings/Taxes/Detail.php:42 | delete → DeleteAction on the bound TaxZone | | Settings\Taxes\TaxRates | packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Settings/Taxes/TaxRates.php:97 | delete → DeleteAction on a TaxRate |

Each file contains zero authorize calls, and the actions declare neither ->authorize() nor an enforced ->visible() guard.

Details

The Settings pages mount these as child Livewire components. The parent page authorizes access_setting (e.g. Pages/Settings/Taxes.php:29), but the child components do not re-check authorization, and their destructive actions carry no ->authorize(). Because each Livewire component handles its own /livewire/update requests, the action executes purely on the page-level access_setting gate — there is no per-resource permission, and delete_zones / delete_taxes permissions are never even generated by the seeder (packages/admin/database/seeders/PermissionsTableSeeder.php).

ZoneShippingOptions::deleteAction() is the clearest case — it deletes by an id taken straight from the client action arguments with no scoping and no permission check:

// packages/admin/src/Livewire/Components/Settings/Zones/ZoneShippingOptions.php
public function deleteAction(): Action
{
    return Action::make('delete')
        ->requiresConfirmation()
        // ... no ->authorize(), no ->visible()
        ->action(function (array $arguments): void {
            CarrierOption::query()->find($arguments['id'])->delete();   // client-controlled id
            // ...
        });
}

Proof of Concept

Confirmed with the project's own test harness (Pest + Orchestra Testbench, SQLite) — the real Livewire/Filament code path, executed as a non-admin user holding only access_setting.

use Livewire\Livewire;
use Shopper\Core\Models\{CarrierOption, Zone};
use Shopper\Livewire\Components\Settings\Zones\ZoneShippingOptions;
use Tests\Core\Stubs\User;

uses(Tests\Admin\TestCase::class);

it('low-priv access_setting user deletes a CarrierOption with no authorization', function (): void { $attacker = User::factory()->create(); $attacker->givePermissionTo('access_setting'); // NOT admin, NO delete_* permission $this->actingAs($attacker, config('shopper.auth.guard'));

$zone = Zone::factory()->create(); $option = CarrierOption::factory()->create(['zone_id' => $zone->id]);

Livewire::test(ZoneShippingOptions::class, ['selectedZoneId' => $zone->id]) ->callAction('delete', arguments: ['id' => $option->id]);

expect(CarrierOption::query()->find($option->id))->toBeNull(); // deleted -> vulnerable });

Result:

Attacker: isAdmin()=false, can('access_setting')=true, can('delete_zones')=false, can('edit_zones')=false
[BEFORE] CarrierOption count = 1  (target #1 'DHL Express' exists = YES)
[ATTACK] callAction('delete', id=1) on ZoneShippingOptions
[AFTER ] CarrierOption count = 0  (target #1 exists = NO -> deleted)

PASS 3 passed (11 assertions) ✓ CONTROL — Order/Detail::markPaid is correctly hidden without edit_orders (harness enforces declared authz) ✓ a CarrierOption is deleted by the low-priv user ✓ a shipping Zone is deleted by the low-priv user

The CONTROL case rules out a false positive: the same harness correctly denies Order/Detail::markPaid for a user lacking edit_orders, proving authorization is enforced when a component declares it — these four components simply declare none.

Impact

A low-privileged staff member (or a compromised low-privileged account) can sabotage the storefront's checkout/revenue path without any delete permission:

  • Delete a CarrierOption → that shipping rate disappears from checkout for the zone.
  • Delete a Zone → removes the country → carrier/payment-method/currency mapping; customers shipping to those countries lose all shipping and payment options (CarrierRateService::getRatesForZone / getManualRates read these directly).
  • Delete a TaxZone / TaxRate → TaxCalculator::resolveZone() can no longer resolve the zone, corrupting tax calculation at checkout.

Net effect: integrity and availability damage to live commerce configuration, performed by a principal who was never granted that authority (least-privilege violation).

Secondary issue found while reproducing

Zones\Detail::deleteAction()->after() calls $this->reset('zone'), but zone is a #[Computed] method (not a property), so it throws ReflectionException after the row is deleted. Worth fixing alongside the authorization gap.

Suggested remediation

Add an authorization check to each action, and ideally a mount() guard on each child component, matching the pattern already used in Settings/Locations/Index.php and Team/RolePermission.php:

public function deleteAction(): Action
{
    return Action::make('delete')
        ->authorize('access_setting')   // or a new granular delete_zones / delete_taxes permission
        ->requiresConfirmation()
        // ...
}

Apply to the delete (and edit) actions in all four components. Consider also generating granular *_zones / *_taxes permissions so settings access can follow least privilege, and fix the $this->reset('zone') call in Zones\Detail.

CVSS v3
5.4
EG Score
5.4MEDIUMlow confidence
EG Risk
29
EG Risk 29/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity54% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
—
EPSS %ILE
—
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 11, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-56826(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
shopper/frameworkv2.0.0 ... v2.9.1 (41 versions)
  • 2.0.0 up to 2.9.2: fixed in 2.9.2
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 0× in last 7d / 2× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-29 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-11 22:24 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-56826?
CVE-2026-56826 is a medium vulnerability published on September 11, 2026. Shopping privilege escalation through missing authorization in Settings components Summary Four Livewire components in the Settings area expose destructive Filament actions (delete / edit) that perform no server-side authorization. Any authenticated user who can reach the Settings pages — i.e.…
When was CVE-2026-56826 disclosed?
CVE-2026-56826 was first published on September 11, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-56826?
CVE-2026-56826 has a CVSS base score of 5.4 (the CNA's own assessment, by github_m; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-56826?
A fix for CVE-2026-56826 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-56826 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-56826

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-56826?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.