Adminer before 5.4.3 uses a CSRF token scheme that transmits both the XOR mask and the masked value in every token (format (rand XOR secret):rand), allowing anyone who observes a single CSRF token (e.g., via network sniffing, log files, Referrer header, or XSS) to recover the session secret with a single XOR operation and forge unlimited valid tokens. The implementation is further weakened by a low-entropy session token (rand(1,1e6), ~20 bits) that permits blind brute-force, and by use of loose comparison (==) in token verification, enabling PHP type juggling. Exploitation enables cross-site request forgery against authenticated sessions, including execution of arbitrary SQL queries.
CVE-2026-56706
Score 6.8 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-08-25. a secondary CVSS source baseline 6.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 6.8
- EG Score
- 6.8(high)
- EG Risk
- 31(Track)EG Risk 31/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity68% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 21%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 25, 2026
Last Modified
August 25, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026Adminer before 5.4.3 CSRF Token Secret Recovery via XOR Masking | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/adminer-before-csrf-token-secret-recovery-via-xor-maskingCSRF Token Secret Recoverable from Single Observed Token, Enabling Cross-Site Request Forgery · Advisory · vrana/adminer · GitHub
https://github.com/vrana/adminer/security/advisories/GHSA-33j4-hc95-pgggVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-56706(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 9× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-25 15:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 15:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 02:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 01:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 01:50 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-330
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-56706?
When was CVE-2026-56706 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-56706 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-56706?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-56706?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-56706
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-56706?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.