CVE-2026-55372

HIGHPre-NVD 7.27.2
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.2 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m
7.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: CVSS: 7.2Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

NukeViet: Pre-authentication SSRF via X-Forwarded-Host

Summary

An unauthenticated attacker can coerce the server into issuing HTTP requests to an attacker-chosen host by spoofing the X Forwarded-Host (and X-Forwarded-Proto) request headers. The forwarded host is used, without validation, to build the URL that server_info_update() fetches with cURL, resulting in a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) that requires no authentication.

Affected component

  • File: includes/ini.php — function server_info_update() (cURL sink)
  • File: vendor/vinades/nukeviet/Core/Server.phpstandardizeHost() and the forwarded-header handling in the constructor (source of the tainted host)
  • Trigger: POST request containing the field __serverInfoUpdate=1, handled early in includes/ini.php before any authentication.

Details

NukeViet\Core\Server derives original_host / original_protocol from the X-Forwarded-Host / X-Forwarded-Proto headers and exposes them via getOriginalHost() / getOriginalProtocol(). These values are attacker-controlled and were not validated against the site's configured domains (my_domains).

In server_info_update() the tainted host and scheme are concatenated directly into a cURL URL:

$proto = $nv_Server->getOriginalProtocol();   // from X-Forwarded-Proto
$host  = $nv_Server->getOriginalHost();        // from X-Forwarded-Host
$ch = curl_init($proto . '://' . $host . NV_BASE_SITEURL . 'index.php?response_headers_detect=1');
curl_exec($ch);

Two factors made this reliably reachable:

  • The __serverInfoUpdate handler runs very early in includes/ini.php, before authentication, so the sink is reachable pre-auth.
  • The host sanitiser standardizeHost() stripped a trailing port only with the regex (\:[0-9]+)$, which is bypassed by appending a slash (e.g. 127.0.0.1:8081/): the string no longer ends in :digits, so the port survives and an arbitrary host:port reaches the cURL call.

Proof of Concept

POST /index.php HTTP/1.1
Host: 
X-Forwarded-Proto: http
X-Forwarded-Host: :/
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Content-Length: 20

__serverInfoUpdate=1

The server then issues a request to the attacker-supplied host, confirmed via an out-of-band interaction (DNS + HTTP) on a collaborator endpoint.

Impact

The SSRF is blind, HEAD-only, and uses a fixed request path (…/index.php?response_headers_detect=1):

  • The fetched response is stored server-side in the config_ini cache and is not reflected to the attacker, so internal data cannot be exfiltrated directly.
  • Because the path is fixed and not attacker-controlled, cloud metadata endpoints (e.g. 169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/...) cannot be reached, and gopher:// / dict:// request smuggling cannot inject arbitrary payloads.

What an attacker can do: unauthenticated internal host/port discovery (connection success/timing, with the port reachable through the regex bypass), and poisoning of the cached server_headers (the SSRF target's response headers are stored and applied to the site).

Severity

Rated High rather than Critical, because the blind + fixed-path + HEAD design of the sink prevents data exfiltration, cloud credential theft, and internal RCE.

  • CVSS v3.1 Base Score: 7.2 (High)
  • Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Weakness

  • Primary: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
  • Contributing: CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation), CWE-644 (Improper Neutralization of HTTP Headers used by downstream components / trusting X-Forwarded-*).

Remediation

Fixed by validating and normalising the forwarded values at the source and gating the request before the sink:

  • standardizeHost() now extracts the host with parse_url() (defeats the :port/ bypass) and lower-cases it.
  • X-Forwarded-Proto is restricted to a {http, https} allow-list and falls back to the real server protocol otherwise.
  • X-Forwarded-Port is validated as numeric and within range.
  • The incoming host is checked against my_domains before includes/ini.php is reached; non-matching hosts are rejected/redirected, and server_info_update() additionally re-validates its target host against my_domains (defense in depth).

Workaround

Configure the reverse proxy / web server to strip or override client-supplied X-Forwarded-Host, X-Forwarded-Proto, and X-Forwarded-Port headers, and ensure my_domains is configured with the site's canonical domain(s).

CVSS v3
7.2
EG Score
7.2(low)
EG Risk
37(Track)
EG Risk 37/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity72% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
EPSS %ILE
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 13, 2026

Last Modified

July 13, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-55372(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
nukeviet/nukeviet4.0.24, 4.4.014.6.00

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 0× in last 7d / 0× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-30 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-26 11:52 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-23 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-13 18:08 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-55372?
CVE-2026-55372 is a high vulnerability published on July 13, 2026. NukeViet: Pre-authentication SSRF via X-Forwarded-Host Summary An unauthenticated attacker can coerce the server into issuing HTTP requests to an attacker-chosen host by spoofing the X Forwarded-Host (and X-Forwarded-Proto) request headers. The forwarded host is used, without validation, to build…
When was CVE-2026-55372 disclosed?
CVE-2026-55372 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 13, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55372?
CVE-2026-55372 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.2 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55372?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-55372, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-55372

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55372?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.