Open Zaak is an open-source data and services layer for Dutch case-oriented working. From 1.0.0 until 1.27.2, 1.28.2, and 1.29.0, the POST search endpoints /zaken/api/v1/zaken/_zoek and /documenten/api/v1/enkelvoudiginformatieobjecten/_zoek do not filter result querysets according to the authorizations associated with the request token. A caller with a valid zaken.lezen or documenten.lezen token can therefore retrieve case or document metadata outside the token's authorized types or confidentiality levels. Document searches require known UUIDs, and document content remains protected by separate download authorization. This issue is fixed in versions 1.27.2, 1.28.2, and 1.29.0.
CVE-2026-54657
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (17th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
The CVE record names the fixed release — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 29EG Risk 29/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity65% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.3% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 17th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (6.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 6.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 16, 2026
Last Modified
October 16, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 16, 2026commit d3869af98c60 (open-zaak/open-zaak)
Fix landed in open-zaak/open-zaak commit d3869af98c60 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/open-zaak/open-zaak/commit/d3869af98c60570782f867bab3e1d14fd8d8330fcommit 4b429d3243d1 (open-zaak/open-zaak)
Fix landed in open-zaak/open-zaak commit 4b429d3243d1 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/open-zaak/open-zaak/commit/4b429d3243d1532f6fe731f932a201cf0ddc4c18commit 15456f1a0ef4 (open-zaak/open-zaak)
Fix landed in open-zaak/open-zaak commit 15456f1a0ef4 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/open-zaak/open-zaak/commit/15456f1a0ef4b0abf1b1c0e3a16c99c15423b9fd/zaken/_zoek and /enkelvoudiginformatieobjecten/_zoek endpoints do not filter result lists based on authorizations linked to token · Advisory · open-zaak/open-zaak · GitHub
https://github.com/open-zaak/open-zaak/security/advisories/GHSA-f29q-7rpr-jmjxWeakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 10× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-16 18:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 18:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 15:29 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 6.5 MEDIUM
- 2026-10-16 15:27 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-54657?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-54657 published?
Is CVE-2026-54657 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54657?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-54657?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-54657
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-54657?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.