rsync daemon before 3.5.0 contains an IP address spoofing vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass IP-based access controls by sending a crafted PROXY protocol header with a forged source address. Attackers who can connect directly to the rsync daemon can inject a spoofed source IP in the PROXY protocol header to circumvent hosts allow/deny rules, gaining unauthorized access that would otherwise be blocked based on their real source address.
CVE-2026-53791
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (41st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.1
- EG Score
- 9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 41EG Risk 41/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity91% × 45%The EG Score, 9.1 of 10.Exploitation0.5% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 41st
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 13, 2026
Last Modified
August 31, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026rsync < 3.5.0 Daemon IP Spoofing via PROXY Protocol Header | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/rsync-daemon-ip-spoofing-via-proxy-protocol-headerrsync: PROXY-protocol mode lets a direct client spoof the daemon's source address · Advisory · RsyncProject/rsync · GitHub
Affected: 3.5.0. (Precise introduced-in ranges being finalised.)
https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/security/advisories/GHSA-h2q9-5fr8-w635v3.5.0
Patch available: RsyncProject/rsync v3.5.0
https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync/releases/tag/v3.5.0Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53791(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:79357Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Cost Management On-Premise container image update
- RHSA-2026:67462Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: rsync security, bug fix, and enhancement update
- CVE-2026-53791Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Critical
rsync < 3.5.0 Daemon IP Spoofing via PROXY Protocol Header
Patch Availability(4)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | costmanagement/costmanagement-ui-rhel10:1791460851 | 2026-10-08 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.22.9.8.202609221802-0 | 2026-09-29 | redhat |
| redhat | rsync-0:3.5.0-3.el10_2 | 2026-09-14 | redhat |
| redhat | rsync-0:3.2.7-1.el9_8 | 2026-09-14 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(7 across 7 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.21(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rsync | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.22(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rsync | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.23(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rsync | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.24(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rsync | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rsync | 3.2.7-1 ... 3.5.1+ds1-1 (32 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rsync | 3.4.1+ds1-5 ... 3.4.4+ds1-1 (13 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rsync | 3.4.1+ds1-5 ... 3.4.4+ds1-1 (9 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(2)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 134× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 196 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 96 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-14 01:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 01:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-12 22:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 22:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 07:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-07 07:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 03:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 23:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 17:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 17:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-06 13:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 18:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 18:58 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-05 14:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 06:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 02:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 02:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-04 22:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 12:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 08:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 03:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 19:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 19:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-03 01:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 21:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 21:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-02 16:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 07:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 07:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-01 14:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 10:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 02:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 21:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 21:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-29 08:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 04:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 04:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 09:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 04:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 00:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 16:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 16:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-27 09:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 09:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-25 11:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 07:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 03:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 03:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-24 13:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 09:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 05:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 00:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 09:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 05:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 01:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 21:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 21:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 12:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 08:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 04:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 00:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 00:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-21 19:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-21 14:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-21 09:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-21 04:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-21 00:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 00:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:02 UTCVendor advisory
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownAlpine:v3.21:rsync
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:67462
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-53791?
When was CVE-2026-53791 made public?
Is CVE-2026-53791 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53791?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53791?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53791
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53791?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.