VeraCrypt provides disk encryption with strong security based on TrueCrypt. Prior to 1.26.29, non-default builds created with WOLFCRYPT=1 and WOLFCRYPT_BACKEND route SHA-256 and SHA-512 volume-header key derivation through derive_key_sha256 and derive_key_sha512 in src/Crypto/wolfCrypt.c, where the configured iterations value is discarded and wc_HKDF is used instead of PBKDF2-HMAC. Changing the PIM or iteration count therefore does not increase derivation cost, allowing an attacker with an affected container, disk image, or volume header to perform substantially cheaper offline password guesses. Official precompiled VeraCrypt binaries and normal distribution packages use the standard PBKDF2 backend and are not affected. Volumes created by an affected WOLFCRYPT=1 build require backup and recreation because corrected builds derive different keys. This issue is fixed in version 1.26.29.
CVE-2026-53762
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.2 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.1%, top 100% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 6.2
- EG Score
- 6.2(medium)
- EG Risk
- 32(Track)EG Risk 32/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity62% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 0%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 21, 2026
Last Modified
August 21, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Aug 21, 2026wolfCrypt backend bypasses VeraCrypt PBKDF2 iteration count (non-default WOLFCRYPT=1 builds) · Advisory · veracrypt/VeraCrypt · GitHub
https://github.com/veracrypt/VeraCrypt/security/advisories/GHSA-94c6-mgmv-mqc5VeraCrypt 1.26.29
Patch available: veracrypt/VeraCrypt VeraCrypt_1.26.29
https://github.com/veracrypt/VeraCrypt/releases/tag/VeraCrypt_1.26.29commit 39f93910075e (veracrypt/VeraCrypt)
Fix landed in veracrypt/VeraCrypt commit 39f93910075e — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/veracrypt/VeraCrypt/commit/39f93910075e1cf492fcf4a9f99a53c7d0b96b87Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 6× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-25 10:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 15:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 19:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 19:04 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-53762?
When was CVE-2026-53762 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-53762 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53762?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53762?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-53762
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53762?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.