Guzzle Services provides an implementation of the Guzzle Command library that uses Guzzle service descriptions to describe web services, serialize requests, and parse responses into easy to use model structures. Versions prior ro 1.5.4 do not safely serialize scalar XML element values containing the CDATA terminator ]]>. The XML request serializer writes values containing <, >, or & with XMLWriter::writeCData($value). If attacker-controlled input contains ]]>, the CDATA section closes early and the remainder is interpreted as XML markup. This is an outgoing request-body integrity issue, not a response parsing issue. The attacker does not need to control the service description or schema. Users are affected when all of the following are true: the application uses guzzlehttp/guzzle-services to serialize outgoing requests; a request parameter or additionalParameters schema uses location: xml; the value is serialized as XML element text, not an XML attribute; the value can contain attacker-controlled, user-controlled, tenant-controlled, or otherwise untrusted input; the value is not constrained by a safe enum, pattern, or custom filter that excludes ]]>; and the downstream service parses the generated XML structurally and may act on unexpected, duplicated, or injected elements. Applications that serialize untrusted input into location: xml request parameters can emit XML containing attacker-controlled elements outside the intended text node. Depending on the receiving service, this can alter operation semantics, smuggle privileged fields, bypass modeled parameter boundaries, or create conflicting duplicated elements. Fixed service descriptions are sufficient if they contain an XML element parameter populated from attacker-controlled input. Users are not directly affected if they only use Guzzle Services to deserialize HTTP response bodies. Response XML parsing uses the response XML location visitor and does not invoke the vulnerable request XML serializer. Response bodies matter only in a second-order flow, such as parsing attacker-controlled response XML, storing or forwarding a parsed string value, and later using it as a location: xml request parameter. The issue is patched in 1.5.3 and later by safely splitting embedded CDATA terminators before serialization. The fix preserves the original scalar value as XML text and prevents injected nodes. As a workaround, constrain attacker-controlled XML element values with a strict enum, pattern, or custom filter that excludes ]]>, or avoid serializing untrusted data into location: xml element text until patched. Where appropriate for the service schema, XML attributes are not affected because they are written with XMLWriter attribute APIs rather than CDATA sections. To determine whether action is needed, search service descriptions for request parameters using location: xml, including operation parameters and additionalParameters. Response-only models are not directly affected unless parsed values are reused for request serialization. For object and array parameters, review nested scalar properties because leaf element values can still be affected.
CVE-2026-53723
This medium-severity CVE scores 5.8 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 88% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 5.8
- EG Score
- 5.8(medium)
- EPSS
- 12.4%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
June 11, 2026
Last Modified
June 11, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Jun 13, 2026XML Injection via CDATA Terminator in guzzlehttp/guzzle-services XML Request Serialization · Advisory · guzzle/guzzle-services · GitHub
https://github.com/guzzle/guzzle-services/security/advisories/GHSA-q8r6-5hfw-5jffVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53723(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| guzzlehttp/guzzle-services | 0.1.0 ... 1.5.3 (24 versions) | 1.5.4 | — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 63× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-07 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 13:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-05 02:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-03 14:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-02 12:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 13:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 13:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-29 10:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 11:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 11:39 UTCEG score recompute
Show 38 moreShow fewer
- 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-26 12:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 07:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 07:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 08:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-22 08:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 08:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-20 08:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-19 09:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 09:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-17 09:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-16 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-16 10:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-15 11:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-14 11:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-13 12:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-12 12:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-11 13:10 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-20
- CVE-2002-2444EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2005-0116NVD 0.0EG 9.0EPSS 99%NONE
- CVE-2002-1359NVD 0.0EG 9.0EPSS 100%NONE
- CVE-2000-0380NVD 0.0EG 9.0EPSS 98%NONE
- CVE-2000-0258EG 7.5EPSS 97%HIGH
- CVE-2004-2771EG 0.0EPSS 93%NONE
- CVE-2002-2443EG 0.0EPSS 93%NONE
- CVE-2002-2433EG 0.0NONE
- CVE-2003-1569EG 0.0NONE
- CVE-2003-1568EG 0.0NONE
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-53723?
When was CVE-2026-53723 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-53723 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53723?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53723?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53723
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53723?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.