FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. In versions 0.5.3 through 0.7.2, the Guest serviceapikey/get_info API endpoint is accessible without authentication. Any caller with a valid API key can retrieve all custom configuration parameters (custom_* fields) stored in the key's database record. These custom fields are populated by billing administrators and can contain business-sensitive data such as pricing tiers, feature flags, rate limits, expiry overrides, or access scope data. Version 0.8.0 patches the issue. Some workarounds are available. Administrators can avoid storing sensitive data in custom_* API key configuration fields, monitor API logs for suspicious calls to /api/guest/serviceapikey/get_info, and/or disable the Serviceapikey module if not in active use.
CVE-2026-53647
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4%, top 66% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 6.9
- EG Score
- 6.9(medium)
- EPSS
- 33.9%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 6, 2026
Last Modified
July 7, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Jul 7, 2026Unauthenticated API key configuration disclosure via guest Serviceapikey get_info endpoint · Advisory · FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling · GitHub
https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/security/advisories/GHSA-737q-9gpr-6mpqWeakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 21× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-14 06:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-13 22:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 05:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 04:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 03:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-10 02:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 01:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 00:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-06 23:35 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-306 · CWE-200
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-53647?
When was CVE-2026-53647 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-53647 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53647?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53647?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-53647
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53647?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.