nebula-mesh is a self-hosted control plane for Slack Nebula mesh VPN. Prior to version 0.3.8, the web handler renderMobileBundle passes the real *pki.CAResolver directly into mobilebundle.Build. Inside Build, resolver.LoadByID decrypts the CA's ed25519 private key into a *pki.CAManager, but Build never calls CAManager.Wipe() on any return path. As a result, when a mobile-bundle request goes through the web UI and Build returns — especially on error (missing network, invalid prefix, DB error, signing failure) — the plaintext CA private key remains on the Go heap, unwiped, until garbage collection. An attacker able to read process memory (core dump, swap, memory-scraping) can recover the CA signing key, which would allow minting arbitrary host certificates for the mesh. The API handler already does this correctly: it loads the CAManager, defer caMgr.Wipe(), and wraps it in caManagerResolver. Only the web path is affected. This issue has been patched in version 0.3.8.
CVE-2026-53604
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (7th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.1
- EG Score
- 7.1HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 32EG Risk 32/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity71% × 45%The EG Score, 7.1 of 10.Exploitation0.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 7th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 14, 2026
Last Modified
September 8, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 4, 2026v0.3.8
Patch available: forgekeep/nebula-mesh v0.3.8
https://github.com/forgekeep/nebula-mesh/releases/tag/v0.3.8commit 1f1ab9aa8472 (forgekeep/nebula-mesh)
Fix landed in forgekeep/nebula-mesh commit 1f1ab9aa8472 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/forgekeep/nebula-mesh/commit/1f1ab9aa8472239763d967e3d50a3cd53a1a79b9CA private key not zeroized on web mobile-bundle error paths · Advisory · forgekeep/nebula-mesh · GitHub
https://github.com/forgekeep/nebula-mesh/security/advisories/GHSA-2p2f-px33-4vv5Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53604(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/forgekeep/nebula-mesh | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-01 12:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-28 08:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
Show 26 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-24 08:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-23 03:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-18 04:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-13 23:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-13 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 21:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-08 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 01:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
- 2026-09-05 20:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 20:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 19:45 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.1 HIGH
- 2026-09-04 19:44 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.1 · CVSS v4 → 7.1
- 2026-08-01 22:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 11:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-14 20:10 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
7 shownGo:github.com/forgekeep/nebula-mesh
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-53604?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-53604 published?
Is CVE-2026-53604 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53604?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53604?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53604
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53604?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.