CVE-2026-53365

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-07-13. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

vsock/virtio: fix zerocopy completion for multi-skb sends

When a large message is fragmented into multiple skbs, the zerocopy uarg is only allocated and attached to the last skb in the loop. Non-final skbs carry pinned user pages with no completion tracking, so the kernel has no way to notify userspace when those pages are safe to reuse. If the loop breaks early the uarg is never allocated at all, leaking pinned pages with no completion notification.

Fix this by following the approach used by TCP: allocate the zerocopy uarg (if not provided by the caller) before the send loop and attach it to every skb via skb_zcopy_set(), which takes a reference per skb. Each skb's completion properly decrements the refcount, and the notification only fires after the last skb is freed. On failure, if no data was sent, the uarg is cleanly aborted via net_zcopy_put_abort().

This issue was initially discovered by sashiko while reviewing commit 1cb36e252211 ("vsock/virtio: fix MSG_ZEROCOPY pinned-pages accounting") but was pre-existing.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
41
EG Risk 41/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
The EG Score, 5.5 of 10.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
8th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 13, 2026

Last Modified

August 18, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jul 22, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

vsock/virtio: fix zerocopy completion for multi-skb sends - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b3155f2b78db21e99256bcf7eb902f24ff6d5338
Web page

vsock/virtio: fix zerocopy completion for multi-skb sends - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae38d9179190a956e2a87a69ef1dd6f451b51c4d
Web page

vsock/virtio: fix zerocopy completion for multi-skb sends - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/76b995bc57bd90cb6e954e1966fbd8786da47f0d

Patch Availability(11)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.12—
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.100-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (31 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1: fixed in 6.12.100-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (142 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.12-1: fixed in 7.0.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(11)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 214 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 114 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 15:57 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  7. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  8. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  9. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  10. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  11. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  12. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  13. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  14. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  15. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  16. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  17. 2026-10-01 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-01 14:12 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-01 14:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  20. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  21. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  22. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  23. 2026-09-28 09:29 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-28 09:29 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-28 09:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  4. 2026-09-24 10:05 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-24 10:05 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-24 10:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  7. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  8. 2026-09-23 04:18 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-23 04:18 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-23 04:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  11. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  12. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  13. 2026-09-18 05:01 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-18 05:01 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-18 05:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  16. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  17. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  18. 2026-09-14 08:29 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-14 08:29 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-14 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  21. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  22. 2026-09-13 07:59 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-13 07:59 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-13 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  25. 2026-09-12 01:51 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-12 01:51 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-12 01:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  28. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  29. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  30. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  31. 2026-09-08 01:55 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-08 01:55 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-09-08 01:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  34. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  35. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  36. 2026-09-05 21:24 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-05 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-09-05 21:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  39. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  40. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  41. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  42. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  43. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  44. 2026-08-30 05:29 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-30 05:29 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-30 05:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  47. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  48. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  49. 2026-08-28 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-28 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-28 03:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  52. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  53. 2026-08-27 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-27 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  55. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  56. 2026-08-26 02:21 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-26 02:21 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-26 02:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  59. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  60. 2026-08-24 19:58 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-24 19:58 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-24 19:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  63. 2026-08-23 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-23 17:50 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-23 17:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  66. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  67. 2026-08-22 17:23 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-22 17:23 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-22 17:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  70. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  71. 2026-08-21 16:40 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-21 16:40 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-21 16:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9p63-4jq7-2c9w · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  74. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  75. 2026-08-20 16:04 UTCEG score recompute

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCHackSpeak/CVE-2026-53365
    Published Aug 19, 2026

    VsockDrop (CVE-2026-53365) Linux kernel io_uring zerocopy vsock LPE exploit mirror — MaherAzzouzi, MIT; for authorized security testing

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53365?
CVE-2026-53365 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 13, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock/virtio: fix zerocopy completion for multi-skb sends When a large message is fragmented into multiple skbs, the zerocopy uarg is only allocated and attached to the last skb in the loop. Non-final skbs carry pinned user pages…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-53365 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-53365 was published on July 13, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 18, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-53365 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53365 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53365?
CVE-2026-53365 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53365?
A fix for CVE-2026-53365 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-53365 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53365

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53365?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.