CVE-2026-53360

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-04. the CNA's CVSS baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: Elevated riskExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: SEV: Require in-GHCB scratch area if GHCB v2+ is in use

As per the GHCB spec, when using GHCB v2+ require the software scratch area to reside in the GHCB's shared buffer. Note, things like Page State Change (PSC) requests _rely_ on this behavior, as the guest can't provide a length when making the request, i.e. the size of the guest payload is bounded by the size of the shared buffer.

Failure to force usage of the GHCB, and a slew of other flaws, lets a malicious SNP guest corrupt host kernel heap memory, and leak host heap layout information.

setup_vmgexit_scratch() allocates a buffer via kvzalloc(exit_info_2), where exit_info_2 is guest-controlled. With exit_info_2=24, this yields a 24-byte allocation in kmalloc-cg-32 (32-byte slab objects). The buffer holds an 8-byte psc_hdr followed by 8-byte psc_entry structs, so only entries[0] and entries[1] are in-bounds.

snp_begin_psc() validates end_entry against VMGEXIT_PSC_MAX_COUNT (253) but NOT against the actual buffer size:

idx_end = hdr->end_entry;

if (idx_end >= VMGEXIT_PSC_MAX_COUNT) { // checks 253, not buffer snp_complete_psc(svm, ...); return 1; }

for (idx = idx_start; idx <= idx_end; idx++) { entry_start = entries[idx]; // OOB when idx >= 2

The guest sets end_entry=10+, causing the host to iterate entries[2+] which are OOB into adjacent slab objects. For each OOB entry:

  • The host reads 8 bytes (OOB READ / info leak oracle)
  • If the data passes PSC validation, __snp_complete_one_psc() writes
cur_page = 1 or 512 into the entry (OOB WRITE, sev.c:3806)
  • If validation fails, the error response reveals whether adjacent
memory is zero vs non-zero (information disclosure to guest)

The guest controls allocation size (exit_info_2), entry range (cur_entry/end_entry), and can fire unlimited VMGEXITs to repeatedly hit different slab positions.

By exploiting the variety of bugs, a malicious SEV-SNP guest can:

  • OOB read adjacent kmalloc-cg-32 objects (heap layout disclosure)
  • OOB write cur_page bits into adjacent objects (heap corruption)
  • Trigger use-after-free conditions across VMGEXITs

E.g. with KASAN enabled, a single insmod of the PoC guest module produces 73 KASAN reports:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in snp_begin_psc+0x126/0x890 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888219ffb5e0 by task qemu-system-x86/2199

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in snp_begin_psc+0x468/0x890 Write of size 8 at addr ffff888351566648 by task qemu-system-x86/2199

The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888XXXXXXXXX which belongs to the cache kmalloc-cg-32 of size 32 The buggy address is located N bytes to the right of allocated 32-byte region [ffff888XXXXXXXXX, ffff888XXXXXXXXX)

Breakdown: 62 slab-out-of-bounds (reads + writes past allocation) 7 slab-use-after-free 4 use-after-free

All credit to Stan for the wonderful description and reproducer!

[sean: write changelog]

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8(medium)
EG Risk
60(Track)
EG Risk 60/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity88% × 45%
Exploitation40% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
15%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 4, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jul 18, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

KVM: SEV: Require in-GHCB scratch area if GHCB v2+ is in use - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/db3f2195d29344a3cf1e9dd9ab7f21ced7308cf7
generic

KVM: SEV: Require in-GHCB scratch area if GHCB v2+ is in use - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b328ede59ac34e7998e1eee5e5f0cc26c2a91846
generic

KVM: SEV: Require in-GHCB scratch area if GHCB v2+ is in use - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c9b4198fbc6ed99a9da4bee9f74bb730f926c9ae
generic

KVM: SEV: Require in-GHCB scratch area if GHCB v2+ is in use - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bf9ba093fbb83c0c9a3dedd50efec29424eca2fc

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53360(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (141 versions)7.0.12-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(8)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 105× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 286 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-06 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-06 14:15 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-06 14:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-05 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-05 23:36 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-05 23:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-31 00:23 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-31 00:23 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-31 00:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-30 11:14 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-30 11:14 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-30 11:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-27 22:09 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-27 22:09 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-27 22:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-27 03:11 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-27 03:11 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-27 03:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-26 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-26 14:00 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-26 13:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-25 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-25 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-25 14:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-25 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-25 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-25 01:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-24 12:38 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-24 12:38 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-24 12:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-23 23:06 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-23 23:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-23 09:48 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-23 09:48 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-23 09:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-22 20:41 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-22 20:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-22 07:34 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-22 07:34 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-22 07:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-21 18:27 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-21 18:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-21 05:20 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-21 05:20 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-21 05:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-20 16:13 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-20 16:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-20 03:06 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-20 03:06 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-20 03:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-19 10:18 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-19 10:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-18 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-18 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-18 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-18 04:06 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-18 04:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-17 14:11 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-17 14:11 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-17 14:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-08-17 01:04 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-17 01:04 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-17 01:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-08-16 11:56 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-16 11:56 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-16 11:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-08-15 22:50 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-15 22:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-15 09:43 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-15 09:43 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-15 09:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-08-14 20:35 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-14 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-14 07:28 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-14 07:28 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-14 07:28 UTCGHSA enrichment

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Working exploit code is in the public domain (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.

  • GitHub PoC0xCyberstan/CVE-2026-53360-POC
    First seen Jul 4, 2026

    PoC for CVE-2026-53360: guest-triggered heap out-of-bounds read/write in KVM SEV-SNP Page State Change (PSC) handling.

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53360?
CVE-2026-53360 is a high vulnerability published on July 4, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SEV: Require in-GHCB scratch area if GHCB v2+ is in use As per the GHCB spec, when using GHCB v2+ require the software scratch area to reside in the GHCB's shared buffer. Note, things like Page State Change (PSC) requests rely…
When was CVE-2026-53360 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53360 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 4, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53360 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53360 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 84.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53360?
CVE-2026-53360 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53360?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53360, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53360

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53360?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.