CVE-2026-53341

NONEPre-NVD 0.0Trending — 5 sources updated this week
0.0
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No confirmed exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fhandle: fix UAF due to unlocked ->mnt_ns read in may_decode_fh()

may_decode_fh() accesses mount::mnt_ns without holding any locks; that means the mount can concurrently be unmounted, and the mnt_namespace can concurrently be freed after an RCU grace period.

This race can happens as follows, assuming that the mount point was created by open_tree(..., OPEN_TREE_CLONE):

thread 1 thread 2 RCU __do_sys_open_by_handle_at do_handle_open handle_to_path may_decode_fh is_mounted [mount::mnt_ns access] [mount::mnt_ns access] __do_sys_close fput_close_sync __fput dissolve_on_fput umount_tree class_namespace_excl_destructor namespace_unlock free_mnt_ns mnt_ns_tree_remove call_rcu(mnt_ns_release_rcu) mnt_ns_release_rcu mnt_ns_release kfree [mnt_namespace::user_ns access] UAF

Fix it by taking rcu_read_lock() around the mount::mnt_ns access, like in __prepend_path(). Additionally, document the semantics of mount::mnt_ns, and use WRITE_ONCE() for writers that can race with lockless readers.

This bug is unreachable unless one of the following is set:

  • CONFIG_PREEMPTION
  • CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD

because it requires an RCU grace period to happen during a syscall without an explicit preemption.

This doesn't seem to have interesting security impact; worst-case, it could leak the result of an integer comparison to userspace (from the level check in cap_capable()), cause an endless loop, or crash the kernel by dereferencing an invalid address.

CVSS v3
EG Score
0.0(none)
EPSS
5.2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 1, 2026

Last Modified

July 4, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53341(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 12× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-04 12:27 UTCNVD update
  6. 2026-07-04 12:16 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  7. 2026-07-04 10:44 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-04 10:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-01 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-07-01 16:04 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-53341?
CVE-2026-53341 is a none vulnerability published on July 1, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fhandle: fix UAF due to unlocked ->mntns read in maydecode_fh() maydecodefh() accesses mount::mnt_ns without holding any locks; that means the mount can concurrently be unmounted, and the mnt_namespace can concurrently be freed…
When was CVE-2026-53341 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53341 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 1, 2026, with the most recent update on July 4, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53341 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53341 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 5.2% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53341?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53341, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-53341

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53341?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.