CVE-2026-53292

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-06-26. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: phonet: do not BUG_ON() in pn_socket_autobind() on failed bind

syzbot reported a kernel BUG triggered from pn_socket_sendmsg() via pn_socket_autobind():

kernel BUG at net/phonet/socket.c:213! RIP: 0010:pn_socket_autobind net/phonet/socket.c:213 [inline] RIP: 0010:pn_socket_sendmsg+0x240/0x250 net/phonet/socket.c:421 Call Trace: sock_sendmsg_nosec+0x112/0x150 net/socket.c:797 __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:812 [inline] __sys_sendto+0x402/0x590 net/socket.c:2280 ...

pn_socket_autobind() calls pn_socket_bind() with port 0 and, on -EINVAL, assumes the socket was already bound and asserts that the port is non-zero:

err = pn_socket_bind(sock, ..., sizeof(struct sockaddr_pn)); if (err != -EINVAL) return err; BUG_ON(!pn_port(pn_sk(sock->sk)->sobject)); return 0; /* socket was already bound */

However pn_socket_bind() also returns -EINVAL when sk->sk_state is not TCP_CLOSE, even when the socket has never been bound and pn_port() is still 0. In that case the BUG_ON() fires and panics the kernel from a user-triggerable path.

Treat the "bind returned -EINVAL but pn_port() is still 0" case as a regular error and propagate -EINVAL to the caller instead of crashing. Existing callers already translate a non-zero return from pn_socket_autobind() into -ENOBUFS/-EAGAIN, so returning -EINVAL here only changes behaviour from panic to a normal errno.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
29
EG Risk 29/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
3rd
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 26, 2026

Last Modified

July 8, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 8, 2026
Patch available.
generic

net: phonet: do not BUG_ON() in pn_socket_autobind() on failed bind - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6db58ee730bf434d1afca91b91826e26688856ed
generic

net: phonet: do not BUG_ON() in pn_socket_autobind() on failed bind - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5b0c911bcdbd982f7748d11c0b39ec5808eae2de

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53292(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(10)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (358 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (181 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (141 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.10-1: fixed in 7.0.10-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(10)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 200 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-23 07:48 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-23 07:48 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-23 07:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-18 07:10 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-18 07:10 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-18 07:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-14 00:58 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-14 00:58 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-14 00:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-12 15:32 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-12 15:32 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-12 15:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-06 15:00 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-06 15:00 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-06 14:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-30 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-30 19:18 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-30 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-27 22:58 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-27 22:58 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-27 22:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-24 12:50 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-08-24 12:50 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-24 12:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-23 10:26 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-23 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-23 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-22 09:23 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-22 09:23 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-22 09:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-21 07:43 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-21 07:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-20 06:42 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-20 06:42 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-20 06:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-18 23:41 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-18 23:41 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-18 23:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-16 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-16 21:26 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-16 21:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-08-15 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-15 20:25 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-15 20:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-08-14 19:23 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-14 19:23 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-14 19:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-08-13 18:22 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-13 18:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-12 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-12 15:40 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-12 15:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-08-11 14:36 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-11 14:36 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53292?
CVE-2026-53292 is a medium vulnerability published on June 26, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: phonet: do not BUGON() in pnsocket_autobind() on failed bind syzbot reported a kernel BUG triggered from pnsocketsendmsg() via pnsocketautobind(): kernel BUG at net/phonet/socket.c:213! RIP: 0010:pnsocketautobind…
When was CVE-2026-53292 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53292 was first published on June 26, 2026, with the most recent update on July 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53292 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53292 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53292?
CVE-2026-53292 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53292?
A fix for CVE-2026-53292 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-53292 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53292

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53292?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.