CVE-2026-53267

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-25. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval

I noticed this issue while looking at a historic syzbot report [1].

A rule like the one below is enough to trigger the bug:

table ip t { chain pre { type filter hook prerouting priority raw; ct zone set 1 ct original saddr 1.2.3.4 accept } }

The first expression attaches a per-cpu template ct via nft_ct_set_zone_eval() (nf_ct_tmpl_alloc -> kzalloc, tuple is all zero, nf_ct_l3num(ct) == 0). The next expression then calls nft_ct_get_eval() on the same skb, treats the template as a real ct and hits the 16-byte memcpy path. With dreg at NFT_REG32_15 this overflows past struct nft_regs on the kernel stack; with smaller dreg values it silently clobbers adjacent registers.

Reject template ct at the eval entry and in nft_ct_get_fast_eval(), mirroring the check nft_ct_set_eval() already has. Additionally, bound the address copy in NFT_CT_SRC / NFT_CT_DST by priv->len instead of by nf_ct_l3num(ct): nf_ct_get_tuple() zeroes the tuple before pkt_to_tuple() fills in only the protocol-relevant leading bytes, so the trailing bytes of tuple->{src,dst}.u3.all are well-defined zero. priv->len is validated at rule load, so the copy size is now bounded by the destination register rather than by an untrusted field on the conntrack.

[1]: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=389cf09cb72926114fce90dc85a2c3231dcb647c

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jun 28, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f071b0bf078146368d18e4eec386bf2ddc0ab7e0
generic

netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/af80f78ce984649e1698b841cd33f4fa505ad828
generic

netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8470f676eadeab99132708acb1a85915664d6115
generic

netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3027ecbdb5fdf9200251c21d4818e4c447ef78e1
generic

netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2e154b5f53f1b0b490c7b8b02499f90feb86b1d5

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53267(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (350 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (145 versions)7.0.13-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 78× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 281 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-30 19:36 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-30 19:36 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-30 19:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-27 23:56 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-27 23:56 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-27 23:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-24 21:51 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-24 21:51 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-24 21:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-24 04:30 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 04:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-23 13:55 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-23 13:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-23 00:51 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-23 00:51 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-23 00:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-22 11:23 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-22 11:23 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-22 11:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-21 22:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-21 09:13 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-21 09:13 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-21 09:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-20 20:09 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-20 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-20 07:05 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-20 07:05 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-20 07:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-19 14:45 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-19 14:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-19 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-19 01:30 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-19 01:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-17 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-17 14:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-17 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-17 00:56 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-17 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-16 11:52 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-16 11:52 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-16 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-15 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-15 22:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-15 09:44 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-15 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-15 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-14 20:39 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-14 20:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-14 07:35 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-14 07:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-13 18:31 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-13 18:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-13 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-12 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-12 15:41 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-12 15:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-08-12 02:30 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-12 02:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-11 13:26 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-11 13:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-11 00:21 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-11 00:21 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-11 00:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-08-10 11:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-09 22:12 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-09 22:12 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-09 22:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-08-09 09:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-08 20:04 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-08 20:04 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-08 20:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53267?
CVE-2026-53267 is a high vulnerability published on June 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval I noticed this issue while looking at a historic syzbot report [1]. A rule like the one below is enough to trigger the bug: table ip t { chain pre { type filter hook prerouting…
When was CVE-2026-53267 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53267 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 25, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53267 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53267 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53267?
CVE-2026-53267 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53267?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53267, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53267

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53267?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.