CVE-2026-53244

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-25. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
7.5
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

VFS: fix possible failure to unlock in nfsd4_create_file()

atomic_create() in fs/namei.c drops the reference to the dentry when it returns an error. This behaviour was imported into dentry_create() so that it will drop the reference if an error is returned from atomic_create(), though not if vfs_create() returns an error (in the case where ->atomic_create is not supported).

The caller - nfsd4_create_file() - is made aware of this by checking path->dentry, which will either be a counted reference to a dentry, or an error pointer.

However the change to use start_creating()/end_creating() (which landed shortly before the dentry_create() change landed, though was likely developed around the same time) means that nfsd4_create_file() *needs* a valid dentry so that it can unlock the parent.

The net result is that if NFSD exports a filesystem which uses ->atomic_create, and if a call to ->atomic_create returns an error, then nfsd4_create_file() will pass an error pointer to end_creating() and the parent will not be unlocked.

Fix this by changing dentry_create() to make sure path->dentry is always a valid dentry, never an error-pointer. The actual error is already returned a different way.

Note that if ->atomic_create() returns a different dentry (which may not be possible in practice) we are guaranteed (because it is only ever provided by d_spliace_alias()) that it will have the same d_parent and so it will have the same effect when passed to end_creating().

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(high)
EPSS
27.9%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

June 30, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jun 28, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

VFS: fix possible failure to unlock in nfsd4_create_file() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee1f40759a50b1800c98c1c369afd5b3e44ad987
generic

VFS: fix possible failure to unlock in nfsd4_create_file() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e824bbd4d224cce4b5fb59cc9dcd3447fe0b7e44

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53244(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53244?
CVE-2026-53244 is a high vulnerability published on June 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: VFS: fix possible failure to unlock in nfsd4createfile() atomic_create() in fs/namei.c drops the reference to the dentry when it returns an error. This behaviour was imported into dentry_create() so that it will drop the reference…
When was CVE-2026-53244 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53244 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 25, 2026, with the most recent update on June 30, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53244 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53244 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 27.9% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53244?
CVE-2026-53244 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53244?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53244, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-53244

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53244?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.