CVE-2026-53154

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-06-25. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths

Two sites in mm/hugetlb.c allocate a hugetlb folio via alloc_hugetlb_folio() (consuming a VMA reservation) and then call copy_user_large_folio(), which became int-returning in commit 1cb9dc4b475c ("mm: hwpoison: support recovery from HugePage copy-on-write faults") and can now fail (e.g. -EHWPOISON on a hwpoisoned source page). On the failure path, folio_put() restores the global hugetlb pool count through free_huge_folio(), but the per-VMA reservation map entry is left marked consumed:

  • hugetlb_mfill_atomic_pte() resubmission path (UFFDIO_COPY)
  • copy_hugetlb_page_range() fork-time CoW path when
hugetlb_try_dup_anon_rmap() fails (rare: pinned hugetlb anon folio under fork)

User-visible effect: on UFFDIO_COPY into a private hugetlb VMA where the resubmission copy fails, the reservation for that address is leaked from the VMA's reserve map. A subsequent fault at the same address takes the no-reservation path, and under hugetlb pool pressure the task is SIGBUSed at an address it had previously reserved. The fork-time CoW path leaks the same way in the child VMA's reserve map, though it requires the much rarer combination of pinned hugetlb anon page + hwpoisoned source.

Add the missing restore_reserve_on_error() call before folio_put() on both error paths.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
29
EG Risk 29/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
1st
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

July 7, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jul 7, 2026
Patch available.
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e47bf16af3c45470ea32f2241fa69aefe0dd61bd
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c72469ac0f274bde3f0df60a4584e14a123d0aa6
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8d6e1dd3ad1340cd8b6d554b7aa93d8f0a1c6d38
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/45e33d43243d71d089af42f5077b8213cee6610f
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/40c81856e622a9dc59294a90d169ac07ea25b0b0

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53154(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(10)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.94-1: fixed in 6.12.94-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (146 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.13-1: fixed in 7.0.13-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(10)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 225 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-23 09:45 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-23 09:45 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-23 09:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-18 07:40 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-18 07:40 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-18 07:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-14 01:28 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-14 01:28 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-14 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-12 16:00 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-12 16:00 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-12 16:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-30 19:43 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-30 19:43 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-30 19:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-28 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-28 02:55 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-28 02:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-24 13:16 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-24 13:16 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-24 13:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-23 09:39 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-23 09:39 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-23 09:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-22 10:55 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-22 10:55 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-22 10:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-21 05:55 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-21 05:55 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-21 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-20 07:11 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-20 07:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-19 01:35 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-19 01:35 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-19 01:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-17 02:43 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-17 02:43 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-17 02:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-16 03:59 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-16 03:59 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-16 03:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-08-15 05:15 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-15 05:15 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-15 05:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-08-14 06:31 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-14 06:31 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-14 06:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-08-13 07:47 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-13 07:47 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-13 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-08-12 08:33 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-12 08:33 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-12 08:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-11 09:49 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-11 09:49 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53154?
CVE-2026-53154 is a medium vulnerability published on June 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths Two sites in mm/hugetlb.c allocate a hugetlb folio via allochugetlbfolio() (consuming a VMA reservation) and then call copyuserlarge_folio(), which became…
When was CVE-2026-53154 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53154 was first published on June 25, 2026, with the most recent update on July 7, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53154 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53154 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53154?
CVE-2026-53154 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53154?
A fix for CVE-2026-53154 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-53154 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53154

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53154?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.