CVE-2026-53018

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-06-24. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 5 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-38886 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-xw4w-5xc6-fwjx (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

f2fs: avoid reading already updated pages during GC

We found the following issue during fuzz testing:

page: refcount:3 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000b6e89c65 index:0x18b2dc pfn:0x161ba9 memcg:f8ffff800e269c00 aops:f2fs_meta_aops ino:2 flags: 0x52880000000080a9(locked|waiters|uptodate|lru|private|zone=1|kasantag=0x4a) raw: 52880000000080a9 fffffffec6e17588 fffffffec0ccc088 a7ffff8067063618 raw: 000000000018b2dc 0000000000000009 00000003ffffffff f8ffff800e269c00 page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_uptodate(folio)) page_owner tracks the page as allocated post_alloc_hook+0x58c/0x5ec prep_new_page+0x34/0x284 get_page_from_freelist+0x2dcc/0x2e8c __alloc_pages_noprof+0x280/0x76c __folio_alloc_noprof+0x18/0xac __filemap_get_folio+0x6bc/0xdc4 pagecache_get_page+0x3c/0x104 do_garbage_collect+0x5c78/0x77a4 f2fs_gc+0xd74/0x25f0 gc_thread_func+0xb28/0x2930 kthread+0x464/0x5d8 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:1563! folio_end_read+0x140/0x168 f2fs_finish_read_bio+0x5c4/0xb80 f2fs_read_end_io+0x64c/0x708 bio_endio+0x85c/0x8c0 blk_update_request+0x690/0x127c scsi_end_request+0x9c/0xb8c scsi_io_completion+0xf0/0x250 scsi_finish_command+0x430/0x45c scsi_complete+0x178/0x6d4 blk_mq_complete_request+0xcc/0x104 scsi_done_internal+0x214/0x454 scsi_done+0x24/0x34

which is similar to the problem reported by syzbot: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3686758660f980b402dc

This case is consistent with the description in commit 9bf1a3f ("f2fs: avoid GC causing encrypted file corrupted"): Page 1 is moved from blkaddr A to blkaddr B by move_data_block, and after being written it is marked as uptodate. Then, Page 1 is moved from blkaddr B to blkaddr C, VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO was triggered in the endio initiated by ra_data_block.

There is no need to read Page 1 again from blkaddr B, since it has already been updated. Therefore, avoid initiating I/O in this case.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 24, 2026

Last Modified

October 30, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jul 15, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

f2fs: avoid reading already updated pages during GC - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b663ebb8a340eae5442e605b6acd2cff5677f016
Web page

f2fs: avoid reading already updated pages during GC - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/570e2ccc7cb35fe720106964e65060602d3d2ac4
Web page

f2fs: avoid reading already updated pages during GC - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4623c251496b99c530ce225c05334f4eac8b933a

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53018(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(13)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-28.28~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1008.8) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1015.15) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1016.16) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2016.16) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (7.0.0-1014.14~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-28.28) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.18.33 (fixes >=4.19.0)—osv
linuxKernel @ 6.6.160 (fixes >=4.19.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (358 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (181 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (141 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.10-1: fixed in 7.0.10-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(11)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 235 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 135 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-10-30 13:32 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-30 13:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xw4w-5xc6-fwjx · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  4. 2026-10-30 12:31 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-30 12:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xw4w-5xc6-fwjx · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  6. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-10-29 07:25 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  9. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 14:21 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 13:51 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-21 13:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xw4w-5xc6-fwjx · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  19. 2026-10-21 12:58 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-21 12:58 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-21 12:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xw4w-5xc6-fwjx · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  22. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  23. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  24. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  25. 2026-10-18 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  2. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  3. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  4. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  5. 2026-10-14 05:24 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  7. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  8. 2026-10-12 15:58 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 19:41 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 16:56 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  13. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  14. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  15. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  16. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  17. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  18. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  19. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  20. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  21. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  22. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  23. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  24. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  25. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  26. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  27. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  28. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  29. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  30. 2026-09-23 11:24 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-23 11:24 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-23 11:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xw4w-5xc6-fwjx · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  33. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  34. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  35. 2026-09-18 07:59 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-18 07:59 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-18 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xw4w-5xc6-fwjx · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  38. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  39. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  40. 2026-09-14 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-14 01:49 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-09-14 01:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xw4w-5xc6-fwjx · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  43. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  44. 2026-09-12 16:53 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-12 16:53 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-12 16:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xw4w-5xc6-fwjx · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  47. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  48. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  49. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  50. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  51. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  52. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  53. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  54. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  55. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  56. 2026-08-30 20:08 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-30 20:08 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-30 20:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xw4w-5xc6-fwjx · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  59. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  60. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  61. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  62. 2026-08-28 04:44 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-28 04:44 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-28 04:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xw4w-5xc6-fwjx · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  65. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  66. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  67. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  68. 2026-08-24 14:32 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-24 14:32 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-24 14:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xw4w-5xc6-fwjx · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  71. 2026-08-23 13:42 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-23 13:42 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-23 13:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xw4w-5xc6-fwjx · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  74. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  75. 2026-08-22 13:04 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53018?
CVE-2026-53018 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: avoid reading already updated pages during GC We found the following issue during fuzz testing: page: refcount:3 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000b6e89c65 index:0x18b2dc pfn:0x161ba9 memcg:f8ffff800e269c00 aops:f2fsmetaaops ino:2…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-53018 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-53018 was published on June 24, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-53018 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53018 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53018?
CVE-2026-53018 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53018?
A fix for CVE-2026-53018 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-53018 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53018

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53018?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.