CVE-2026-53017

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-06-24. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

f2fs: fix data loss caused by incorrect use of nat_entry flag

Data loss can occur when fsync is performed on a newly created file (before any checkpoint has been written) concurrently with a checkpoint operation. The scenario is as follows:

create & write & fsync 'file A' write checkpoint

  • f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode
  • f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty
  • f2fs_write_checkpoint
  • f2fs_flush_merged_writes
  • f2fs_sync_node_pages
  • f2fs_flush_nat_entries
  • f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node
  • f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return false
SPO and lost 'file A'

f2fs_flush_nat_entries() sets the IS_CHECKPOINTED and HAS_LAST_FSYNC flags for the nat_entry, but this does not mean that the checkpoint has actually completed successfully. However, f2fs_need_inode_block_update() checks these flags and incorrectly assumes that the checkpoint has finished.

The root cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and HAS_LAST_FSYNC are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write fully completes.

This patch modifies f2fs_need_inode_block_update() to acquire the sbi->node_write lock before reading the nat_entry flags, ensuring that once IS_CHECKPOINTED and HAS_LAST_FSYNC are observed to be set, the checkpoint operation has already completed.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 24, 2026

Last Modified

July 15, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 15, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

f2fs: fix data loss caused by incorrect use of nat_entry flag - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/238e14eb7226f883b72caccd2d37bf5707df066b
generic

f2fs: fix data loss caused by incorrect use of nat_entry flag - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/20cedb4d9f6b230d0ee469690b8f868f06a07c29

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53017(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (350 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (174 versions)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (140 versions)7.0.10-1

All Vendor Advisories

(8)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 59× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 167 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-30 20:08 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-30 20:08 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-30 20:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-28 04:44 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-28 04:44 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-28 04:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-24 13:42 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-24 13:42 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-24 13:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-23 13:27 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-23 13:27 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-23 13:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-22 13:04 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-22 13:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-21 07:39 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-21 07:39 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-21 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-20 07:27 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-20 07:27 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-20 07:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-19 02:10 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-19 02:10 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-19 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-17 10:41 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-17 10:41 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-17 10:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-16 10:31 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-16 10:31 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-16 10:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-15 10:21 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-15 10:21 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-15 10:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-14 10:10 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-08-14 10:10 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-14 10:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-13 09:59 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-13 09:59 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-13 09:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-12 09:49 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-12 09:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-11 09:38 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-11 09:38 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-11 09:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-10 09:27 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-10 09:27 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-10 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-09 09:17 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-09 09:17 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-09 09:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-08 09:07 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-08 09:07 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-08 09:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-07 08:56 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-07 08:56 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-07 08:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-08-06 08:46 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-06 08:46 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-06 08:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-08-05 08:35 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-05 08:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-08-04 04:25 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-04 04:25 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-04 04:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-08-03 04:15 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-03 04:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-02 04:04 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-02 04:04 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-02 04:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-08-01 03:53 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53017?
CVE-2026-53017 is a medium vulnerability published on June 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix data loss caused by incorrect use of nat_entry flag Data loss can occur when fsync is performed on a newly created file (before any checkpoint has been written) concurrently with a checkpoint operation. The scenario is as…
When was CVE-2026-53017 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53017 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 24, 2026, with the most recent update on July 15, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53017 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53017 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53017?
CVE-2026-53017 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53017?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53017, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53017

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53017?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.