CVE-2026-52980

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sched/fair: Clear rel_deadline when initializing forked entities

A yield-triggered crash can happen when a newly forked sched_entity enters the fair class with se->rel_deadline unexpectedly set.

The failing sequence is:

• A task is forked while se->rel_deadline is still set.
• __sched_fork() initializes vruntime, vlag and other sched_entity

state, but does not clear rel_deadline.

• On the first enqueue, enqueue_entity() calls place_entity().
• Because se->rel_deadline is set, place_entity() treats se->deadline

as a relative deadline and converts it to an absolute deadline by adding the current vruntime.

• However, the forked entity's deadline is not a valid inherited

relative deadline for this new scheduling instance, so the conversion produces an abnormally large deadline.

• If the task later calls sched_yield(), yield_task_fair() advances

se->vruntime to se->deadline.

• The inflated vruntime is then used by the following enqueue path,

where the vruntime-derived key can overflow when multiplied by the entity weight.

• This corrupts cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime, breaks EEVDF eligibility

calculation, and can eventually make all entities appear ineligible. pick_next_entity() may then return NULL unexpectedly, leading to a later NULL dereference.

A captured trace shows the effect clearly. Before yield, the entity's vruntime was around:

9834017729983308

After yield_task_fair() executed:

se->vruntime = se->deadline

the vruntime jumped to:

19668035460670230

and the deadline was later advanced further to:

19668035463470230

This shows that the deadline had already become abnormally large before yield_task_fair() copied it into vruntime.

rel_deadline is only meaningful when se->deadline really carries a relative deadline that still needs to be placed against vruntime. A freshly forked sched_entity should not inherit or retain this state. Clear se->rel_deadline in __sched_fork(), together with the other sched_entity runtime state, so that the first enqueue does not interpret the new entity's deadline as a stale relative deadline.