CVE-2026-52977

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-06-24. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

futex: Prevent lockup in requeue-PI during signal/ timeout wakeup

During wait-requeue-pi (task A) and requeue-PI (task B) the following race can happen:

Task A Task B futex_wait_requeue_pi() futex_setup_timer() futex_do_wait() futex_requeue() CLASS(hb, hb1)(&key1); CLASS(hb, hb2)(&key2); *timeout* futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync() requeue_state = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE

*blocks on hb->lock*

futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() futex_requeue_pi_prepare() Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE => -EAGAIN double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2) *retry*

Task B acquires both hb locks and attempts to acquire the PI-lock of the top most waiter (task B). Task A is leaving early due to a signal/ timeout and started removing itself from the queue. It updates its requeue_state but can not remove it from the list because this requires the hb lock which is owned by task B.

Usually task A is able to swoop the lock after task B unlocked it. However if task B is of higher priority then task A may not be able to wake up in time and acquire the lock before task B gets it again. Especially on a UP system where A is never scheduled.

As a result task A blocks on the lock and task B busy loops, trying to make progress but live locks the system instead. Tragic.

This can be fixed by removing the top most waiter from the list in this case. This allows task B to grab the next top waiter (if any) in the next iteration and make progress.

Remove the top most waiter if futex_requeue_pi_prepare() fails. Let the waiter conditionally remove itself from the list in handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup().

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 24, 2026

Last Modified

August 19, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Jul 15, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

futex: Prevent lockup in requeue-PI during signal/ timeout wakeup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e3f95b1ba242e37093305812df7fdbe7288a43ac
generic

futex: Prevent lockup in requeue-PI during signal/ timeout wakeup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc7304f3ae20972d11db6e0b1b541c63feda5f05
generic

futex: Prevent lockup in requeue-PI during signal/ timeout wakeup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69a7cfc66405aeaa2483147653d031b3592ffc9c
generic

futex: Prevent lockup in requeue-PI during signal/ timeout wakeup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e0ed44e51727d56244a822ab941efe507c47966
generic

futex: Prevent lockup in requeue-PI during signal/ timeout wakeup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0aacb6d18f76552e3e0ee25d9f40d21b3486f4cf
generic

futex: Prevent lockup in requeue-PI during signal/ timeout wakeup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0304d60abb9dcc02bc7fe6d1850f4ca206e8f1a0

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-52977(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(22)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-28.28) @ resolute2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-136.136) @ noble2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-28.28~24.04.1) @ noble2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1008.8) @ resolute2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1058.61) @ noble2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (6.8.0-1058.61~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1059.62.1) @ noble2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1061.64+1) @ noble2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1063.71) @ noble2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1062.69) @ noble2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1063.71+fips2) @ noble2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-6.8 (6.8.0-1062.69~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1015.15) @ resolute2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1061.64+fips1) @ noble2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1016.16) @ resolute2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2016.16) @ resolute2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-6.8 (6.8.0-2050.52) @ noble2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-136.136~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp (6.8.0.1033.34) @ noble2026-08-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1064.72+fips1) @ noble2026-08-30ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.174-1~deb11u1 (20 versions)6.1.176-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (140 versions)7.0.10-1

Additional Vendor Advisories

(22)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 66× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 180 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-30 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-30 20:14 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-30 20:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-28 04:48 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-28 04:48 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-28 04:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-25 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-25 00:56 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-25 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-23 23:49 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-23 23:49 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-23 23:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-22 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-22 22:42 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-22 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-21 20:05 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-21 20:05 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-21 20:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-20 18:58 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-20 18:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-19 17:51 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-19 17:51 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-19 17:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-19 02:14 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-19 02:14 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-19 02:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-17 06:11 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-17 06:11 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-17 06:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-16 04:30 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-16 04:30 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-16 04:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-15 03:23 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-15 03:23 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-15 03:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-14 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-14 02:16 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-14 02:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-13 01:09 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-13 01:09 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-13 01:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-12 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-12 00:03 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-12 00:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-10 22:55 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-10 22:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-09 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-09 21:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-08 20:42 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-08 20:42 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-08 20:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-07 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-07 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-07 19:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-06 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-06 18:28 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-06 18:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-08-05 17:22 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-05 17:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-04 15:11 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-04 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-04 15:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-08-03 07:57 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-03 07:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-02 05:48 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-02 05:48 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-02 05:48 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-52977?
CVE-2026-52977 is a medium vulnerability published on June 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: futex: Prevent lockup in requeue-PI during signal/ timeout wakeup During wait-requeue-pi (task A) and requeue-PI (task B) the following race can happen: Task A Task B futexwaitrequeue_pi() futexsetuptimer() futexdowait()…
When was CVE-2026-52977 disclosed?
CVE-2026-52977 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 24, 2026, with the most recent update on August 19, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-52977 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-52977 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-52977?
CVE-2026-52977 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-52977?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-52977, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-52977

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-52977?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.