CVE-2026-52948

NONECVSS 0.0
0.0
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No confirmed exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

i2c: dev: prevent integer overflow in I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl

While fuzzing with Syzkaller, a persistent schedule_timeout: wrong timeout value warning was observed, accompanied by SMBus controller state machine corruption.

The I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl accepts a user-provided timeout in multiples of 10 ms. The user argument is checked against INT_MAX, but it is subsequently multiplied by 10 before being passed to msecs_to_jiffies().

A malicious user can pass a large value (e.g., 429496729) that passes the arg > INT_MAX check but overflows when multiplied by 10. This results in a truncated 32-bit unsigned value that bypasses the internal (int)m < 0 check in msecs_to_jiffies().

The truncated value is then assigned to client->adapter->timeout (a signed 32-bit int), which is reinterpreted as a negative number. When passed to wait_for_completion_timeout(), this negative value undergoes sign extension to a 64-bit unsigned long, triggering the schedule_timeout warning and causing premature returns. This leaves the SMBus state machine in an unrecoverable state, constituting a local Denial of Service (DoS).

Fix this by bounding the user argument to INT_MAX / 10.

[wsa: move the comment as well]

CVSS v3
EG Score
0.0(none)
EPSS
8.3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 24, 2026

Last Modified

June 29, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-52948(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 24× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-05 16:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-02 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-30 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-29 08:04 UTCNVD update
  15. 2026-06-29 05:17 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  16. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-27 12:04 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-06-27 12:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-24 18:30 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-06-24 18:02 UTCNVD updatefirst tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-52948?
CVE-2026-52948 is a none vulnerability published on June 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i2c: dev: prevent integer overflow in I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl While fuzzing with Syzkaller, a persistent schedule_timeout: wrong timeout value warning was observed, accompanied by SMBus controller state machine corruption. The…
When was CVE-2026-52948 disclosed?
CVE-2026-52948 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 24, 2026, with the most recent update on June 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-52948 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-52948 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 8.3% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-52948?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-52948, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-52948

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-52948?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.