The MCP Python SDK, called mcp on PyPI, is a Python implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP). From 1.23.0 until 1.27.2, default handlers installed by server.experimental.enable_tasks() for tasks/list, tasks/get, tasks/result, and tasks/cancel operate only on task identifiers without recording the session that created each task, allowing any connected client to enumerate, read results from, consume messages for, or cancel other clients' tasks. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.2.
CVE-2026-52870
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (31st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.6
- EG Score
- 7.6HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 34EG Risk 34/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity76% × 45%The EG Score, 7.6 of 10.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 31st
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 15, 2026
Last Modified
July 17, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Jul 15, 2026Experimental task handlers allow any client to access and cancel other clients' tasks · Advisory · modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk · GitHub
https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/security/advisories/GHSA-hvrp-rf83-w775v1.27.2
Patch available: modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk v1.27.2
https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/releases/tag/v1.27.2[v1.x] Scope experimental tasks to the session that created them
Patch available: modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk v1.27.2 (PR #2720 merged 2026-05-29)
https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/pull/2720commit 62137874ff26 (modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk)
Patch available: modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk v1.27.2 (contains commit 62137874ff26)
https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/commit/62137874ff26dd74d2fea80ff528a7fd9ca7a5e7Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-52870(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| mcp | 1.23.0 ... 1.27.1 (9 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 125 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 25 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-01 12:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-28 08:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-24 08:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-23 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-18 04:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-13 23:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-13 07:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-08 00:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-05 20:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-31 03:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-30 03:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-28 01:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-26 23:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-25 21:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-24 21:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 09:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-20 23:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-20 00:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-18 22:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-17 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-16 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-16 12:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-15 12:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-14 01:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-12 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-11 15:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 03:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-09 16:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-07 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 18:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-06 06:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-04 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-02 08:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-08-01 09:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
5 shownPyPI:mcp
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-52870?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-52870 published?
Is CVE-2026-52870 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-52870?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-52870?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-52870
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-52870?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.