CVE-2026-52820

MEDIUMPre-NVD 0.0
0.0
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No confirmed exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: CVSS: Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Kimai: Timesheet PATCH/POST allows assigning to project outside user's team via query_builder OR-bypass

Summary

The Timesheet API PATCH /api/timesheets/{id} and POST /api/timesheets endpoints accept a user-supplied project ID and resolve it through a Symfony EntityType whose query_builder allows the submitted ID to satisfy the access predicate via an unconditional OR branch. As a result, any authenticated user can re-assign their own timesheet to any project in the database — including projects that belong to teams or customers they have no membership in and cannot otherwise see. The user can then read serialized project/customer details via GET /api/timesheets/{id}?full=true, leaking metadata (name, currency, customer hierarchy) that would otherwise be filtered out by the team ACL.

Details

Entry point — only ownership is checked in src/API/TimesheetController.php:317-355

#[IsGranted('edit', 'timesheet')]
#[Route(methods: ['PATCH'], path: '/{id}', name: 'patch_timesheet', requirements: ['id' => '\d+'])]
public function patchAction(Request $request, Timesheet $timesheet): Response
{
    ...
    $form = $this->createForm(TimesheetApiEditForm::class, $timesheet, [...]);
    $form->setData($timesheet);
    $form->submit($request->request->all(), false);
    if (false === $form->isValid()) { ... }
    $this->service->saveTimesheet($timesheet);
    ...
}

src/Voter/TimesheetVoter.php:134-142:

if ($subject->getUser()?->getId() === $user->getId()) {
    return $this->permissionManager->hasRolePermission($user, $permission . '_own_timesheet');
}

if (!$this->permissionManager->checkTeamAccessTimesheet($subject, $user)) { return false; }

For an own-timesheet, only edit_own_timesheet is required. The voter does not look at the *new* project being submitted; it only validates the existing record's ownership.

Form replays user-controlled project ID into the access query

src/Form/TimesheetEditForm.php:60-71:

$isNew = true;
if (isset($options['data']) && $options['data'] instanceof Timesheet) {
    ...
    if (null !== $entry->getId()) {
        $isNew = false;
    }
    ...
}
$this->addProject($builder, $isNew, $project, $customer);

src/Form/FormTrait.php:59-100:

$builder->addEventListener(
    FormEvents::PRE_SUBMIT,
    function (FormEvent $event) use ($builder, $project, $customer, $isNew, $options): void {
        $data = $event->getData();
        $customer = \array_key_exists('customer', $data) && $data['customer'] !== '' ? $data['customer'] : null;
        $project = \array_key_exists('project', $data) && $data['project'] !== '' ? $data['project'] : $project;

$event->getForm()->add('project', ProjectType::class, array_merge($options, [ 'group_by' => null, 'query_builder' => function (ProjectRepository $repo) use ($builder, $project, $customer, $isNew) { $project = \is_string($project) ? (int) $project : $project; ... if ($isNew && \is_int($project)) { $project = $repo->find($project); if ($project !== null) { if (!$project->getCustomer()->isVisible()) { ... $project = null; } elseif (!$project->isVisible()) { $project = null; } } } ... $query = new ProjectFormTypeQuery($project, $customer); $query->setUser($builder->getOption('user')); $query->setWithCustomer(true); return $repo->getQueryBuilderForFormType($query); }, ])); } );

Two problems compound:

  • The visibility re-check on line 73 is gated on $isNew. For PATCH, $isNew = false, so the closure passes the attacker-supplied ID straight through.
  • Even when $isNew = true (POST), the re-check only validates isVisible() — it does not validate team membership.

The query-builder unconditionally accepts the submitted ID

src/Repository/ProjectRepository.php:150-208:

public function getQueryBuilderForFormType(ProjectFormTypeQuery $query): QueryBuilder
{
    ...
    $mainQuery = $qb->expr()->andX();
    $mainQuery->add($qb->expr()->eq('p.visible', ':visible'));
    $mainQuery->add($qb->expr()->eq('c.visible', ':customer_visible'));
    if (!$query->isIgnoreDate()) { ... }
    if ($query->hasCustomers()) { ... }

$permissions = $this->getPermissionCriteria($qb, $query->getUser(), $query->getTeams()); if ($permissions->count() > 0) { $mainQuery->add($permissions); }

$outerQuery = $qb->expr()->orX(); if ($query->hasProjects()) { $outerQuery->add($qb->expr()->in('p.id', ':project')); // <-- unconditional $qb->setParameter('project', $query->getProjects()); } ... $outerQuery->add($mainQuery); $qb->andWhere($outerQuery); return $qb; }

The final WHERE clause is roughly:

WHERE (p.id IN (:project)) OR (p.visible AND c.visible AND  AND )

Because :project is the submitted ID itself, the first branch matches unconditionally, completely bypassing the team-ACL applied by getPermissionCriteria. Symfony's EntityType happily resolves the foreign Project entity, the form passes validation, and the timesheet is persisted with the new project_id.

No downstream validation closes the gap

  • TimesheetService::saveTimesheetupdateTimesheet (src/Timesheet/TimesheetService.php:154-177) is explicitly documented as *not* validating.
  • TimesheetBasicValidator only validates begin/end and project/activity coherence.
  • TimesheetDeactivatedValidator::validateActivityAndProject (src/Validator/Constraints/TimesheetDeactivatedValidator.php:36-42) returns early for non-running existing timesheets.
  • No validator anywhere in the timesheet pipeline checks that the project's team membership intersects the acting user's teams.

*A PoC was provided, but removed for security reasons.*

Impact

  • Integrity: any authenticated user can attribute their own tracked time to any project ID in the database — including projects belonging to teams/customers they cannot see. This pollutes per-project budgets, billing exports and reports for other teams. There is no in-app warning that records belonging to outsiders have been added.
  • Confidentiality: by reading the timesheet back via ?full=true, the attacker obtains serialized project and customer details (name, currency, start/end dates, customer hierarchy) which would normally be filtered by the team ACL.
  • Privilege model: the edit_own_timesheet permission is part of the default ROLE_USER, so the bypass is reachable by every regular user without any administrator action.

The blast radius is bounded by what an attacker can persist (their own timesheet rows) and what the ?full=true serializer exposes — there is no direct ability to modify other teams' existing data.

Solution

  • The FormTrait was updated to only pass the project forward for new timesheets
  • A new TimesheetTeamAccessValidatorwas added, which checks if project or activity were changed. If that is the case, the team access permission is checked first

Find out more at https://www.kimai.org/en/security/ghsa-vrr2-g9gh-c3jc

CVSS v3
EG Score
0.0(none)
EPSS
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 13, 2026

Last Modified

July 13, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-52820(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 1× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-14 00:09 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(3)

What is CVE-2026-52820?
CVE-2026-52820 is a medium vulnerability published on July 13, 2026. Kimai: Timesheet PATCH/POST allows assigning to project outside user's team via query_builder OR-bypass Summary The Timesheet API PATCH /api/timesheets/{id} and POST /api/timesheets endpoints accept a user-supplied project ID and resolve it through a Symfony EntityType whose query_builder allows…
When was CVE-2026-52820 disclosed?
CVE-2026-52820 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 13, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-52820?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-52820, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-52820

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-52820?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.