CVE-2026-52736

HIGHPre-NVD 0.0
0.0
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No confirmed exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: CVSS: Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Zebra has block suppression via NU5 same-header body poisoning of sent-hash cache

Description

Am I affected

You are affected if:

  • You run any version of zebrad up to and including v4.4.1.
  • Your node accepts inbound P2P connections (network.listen_addr is set, which is the default).
  • Your node processes blocks past the checkpoint height (non-finalized state is active).

All default configurations are affected.

Summary

Zebra records a block hash in non_finalized_block_write_sent_hashes when the block is sent to the write task, before contextual validation completes. If validation fails, the hash is not removed. A remote unauthenticated peer can deliver a poisoned block body that shares a header hash with a later valid canonical block. The poisoned body is rejected, but the hash remains cached. When the valid canonical block arrives, Zebra treats it as a duplicate and rejects it. The node cannot advance past that height until restart or a reorg event.

Details

ZIP-244 defines txid_v5 without binding transparent input scriptSig, which lives in auth_digest and is committed to by hashBlockCommitments in the block header. Because merkle_root is computed over txids (not auth digests), and the block hash is computed over the header, an attacker can construct two blocks with identical header hashes but different transaction bodies by mutating the coinbase scriptSig.

The attack flow over P2P:

  • Attacker observes a new block header (from any peer).
  • Attacker constructs a poisoned body by flipping a byte of the coinbase scriptSig extra-data section. The block hash is unchanged.
  • Attacker advertises the block hash via inv to the target node.
  • Target requests the block via getdata; attacker serves the poisoned body.
  • Zebra adds the hash to non_finalized_block_write_sent_hashes before validation.
  • The write task rejects the body at block_commitment_is_valid_for_chain_history (auth_data_root mismatch).
  • The hash is not removed from non_finalized_block_write_sent_hashes.
  • When the valid canonical block arrives (from honest peers or RPC), queue_and_commit_to_non_finalized_state sees the hash in the cache and returns KnownBlock::WriteChannel duplicate.
  • The node is stuck at height N-1.

A secondary variant exists where chain pruning (via MAX_NON_FINALIZED_CHAIN_FORKS) removes a chain from chain_set but leaves its block hashes in non_finalized_block_write_sent_hashes, producing the same lockout for children of the pruned fork.

Patches

Patched in Zebra 4.4.2. The fix removes stale entries from non_finalized_block_write_sent_hashes on every failed non-finalized write path.

Workarounds

There is no complete configuration-level workaround. Reducing the node's inbound peer count (network.peerset_initial_target_size) narrows the attack surface but does not eliminate it. Restarting the node clears the in-memory cache and allows the valid block to be re-fetched.

Impact

A remote unauthenticated P2P peer can permanently stall a targeted Zebra node at a specific block height. The node diverges from the network tip; downstream consumers (lightwalletd, wallets, explorers, mining infrastructure) relying on the node see a stalled chain. The attack requires winning a propagation race: delivering the poisoned block body before honest peers deliver the canonical block. A well-positioned attacker (low-latency connection to the target, observation of new blocks from other peers) can reliably win this race. In sustained form, the attacker repeats for each new block, keeping the target permanently behind.

Recovery requires restarting the node (which clears the in-memory sent-hash cache) or waiting for a reorg at the affected height (rare on the canonical chain).

Credit

Reported independently by @ipwning (primary, with ZIP-244 malleability analysis and zcashd cross-reference) and @x15-eth (first reporter, with E2E reproduction and control experiment).

CVSS v3
EG Score
0.0(none)
EPSS
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 2, 2026

Last Modified

July 2, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-52736(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 1× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-02 20:07 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(3)

What is CVE-2026-52736?
CVE-2026-52736 is a high vulnerability published on July 2, 2026. Zebra has block suppression via NU5 same-header body poisoning of sent-hash cache Description Am I affected You are affected if: 1. You run any version of zebrad up to and including v4.4.1. 2. Your node accepts inbound P2P connections (network.listen_addr is set, which is the default). 3. Your node…
When was CVE-2026-52736 disclosed?
CVE-2026-52736 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 2, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-52736?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-52736, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-52736

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-52736?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.