Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. Prior to version 0.19.5, GET /api/books/{bookID}/notes is an unauthenticated endpoint that accepts a "deleted" query parameter. When the request is ?deleted=true, the service runs the query with Unscoped() (bypassing GORM's soft-delete scope) but keeps the read-authorization clause as "owner_id = ? OR is_public = ?". As a result, any unauthenticated caller can enumerate the metadata of soft-deleted ("trashed") notes belonging to any public book — notes the owner explicitly deleted and expected to be removed from public view. This issue has been patched in version 0.19.5.
CVE-2026-50554
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This medium-severity CVE scores 5.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 55EG Risk 55/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity53% × 45%The EG Score, 5.3 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 34th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 9, 2026
Last Modified
September 9, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 3, 2026V0.19.5
Patch available: enchant97/note-mark v0.19.5
https://github.com/enchant97/note-mark/releases/tag/v0.19.5commit 9c9b72740f22 (enchant97/note-mark)
Patch available: enchant97/note-mark v0.19.5 (contains commit 9c9b72740f22)
https://github.com/enchant97/note-mark/commit/9c9b72740f22a06131a8f64b53bb08e3b05b81a6Unauthenticated disclosure of soft-deleted note metadata via deleted=true on public books in note-mark · Advisory · enchant97/note-mark · GitHub
https://github.com/enchant97/note-mark/security/advisories/GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvfVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-50554(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-01 16:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-28 10:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-24 11:40 UTCEG score recompute
Show 23 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-23 05:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-18 05:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-14 07:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-13 08:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 03:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-09 22:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-05 22:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-03 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-30 12:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-09 13:45 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
8 shownGo:github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-50554?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-50554 published?
Is CVE-2026-50554 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-50554?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-50554?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-50554
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-50554?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.