CVE-2026-50554

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated
5.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. Prior to version 0.19.5, GET /api/books/{bookID}/notes is an unauthenticated endpoint that accepts a "deleted" query parameter. When the request is ?deleted=true, the service runs the query with Unscoped() (bypassing GORM's soft-delete scope) but keeps the read-authorization clause as "owner_id = ? OR is_public = ?". As a result, any unauthenticated caller can enumerate the metadata of soft-deleted ("trashed") notes belonging to any public book — notes the owner explicitly deleted and expected to be removed from public view. This issue has been patched in version 0.19.5.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
55
EG Risk 55/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity53% × 45%
The EG Score, 5.3 of 10.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
34th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 9, 2026

Last Modified

September 9, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 3, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub release Patch Available

V0.19.5

Patch available: enchant97/note-mark v0.19.5

https://github.com/enchant97/note-mark/releases/tag/v0.19.5
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 9c9b72740f22 (enchant97/note-mark)

Patch available: enchant97/note-mark v0.19.5 (contains commit 9c9b72740f22)

https://github.com/enchant97/note-mark/commit/9c9b72740f22a06131a8f64b53bb08e3b05b81a6
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Unauthenticated disclosure of soft-deleted note metadata via deleted=true on public books in note-mark · Advisory · enchant97/note-mark · GitHub

https://github.com/enchant97/note-mark/security/advisories/GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-50554(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend—
  • every version up to 0.0.0-20260601210758-9c9b72740f22: fixed in 0.0.0-20260601210758-9c9b72740f22
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 15:59 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:42 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  13. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  15. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  17. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  18. 2026-10-01 16:03 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  20. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  21. 2026-09-28 10:55 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  23. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  24. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  25. 2026-09-24 11:40 UTCEG score recompute
Show 23 more
  1. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  2. 2026-09-23 05:59 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  4. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  5. 2026-09-18 05:37 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  7. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  8. 2026-09-14 07:58 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  10. 2026-09-13 08:20 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-12 03:25 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  13. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  14. 2026-09-09 22:57 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  16. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  17. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  18. 2026-09-05 22:36 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-03 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-30 12:14 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-26 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-07-23 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-07-09 13:45 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-50554?
CVE-2026-50554 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 9, 2026. Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. Prior to version 0.19.5, GET /api/books/{bookID}/notes is an unauthenticated endpoint that accepts a "deleted" query parameter. When the request is ?deleted=true, the service runs the query with Unscoped() (bypassing GORM's soft-delete scope) but…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-50554 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-50554 was published on July 9, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 9, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-50554 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-50554 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-50554?
CVE-2026-50554 has a CVSS base score of 5.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-50554?
A fix for CVE-2026-50554 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-50554 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-50554

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-50554?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.