CVE-2026-49989

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 81% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Elevated
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: Elevated riskExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

CrateDB is a distributed SQL database. Prior to versions 6.2.8 and 6.3.2, any authenticated user can read or delete any blob whose SHA-1 digest they know, and can plant new blobs unconditionally, in any blob table, regardless of GRANTs. CrateDB has two ways to access blob storage: SQL (SELECT ... FROM blob. and friends) and the blob HTTP API (GET|PUT|DELETE /_blobs/{table}/{digest}). The SQL path goes through AccessControl, which is what enforces privilege grants; that's why SELECT digest FROM blob.secret_blobs fails for a user who has no grants on the table. The HTTP path authenticates the request but never asks AccessControl whether the authenticated user is allowed to touch the table. So a user with no grants gets MissingPrivilegeException from SQL and 200 OK plus the blob bytes from GET /_blobs/secret_blobs/. Deployments that don't use BLOB TABLE are unaffected. Authentication itself still works; the bug is strictly that being authenticated as anyone is treated as sufficient for any blob op. Versions 6.2.8 and 6.3.2 fix the issue.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1(medium)
EG Risk
48(Track)
EG Risk 48/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation40% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
19%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 1, 2026

Last Modified

August 14, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Aug 14, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github.
github Patch Available🟡 PoC Available

Blob HTTP handler bypasses authorization · Advisory · crate/crate · GitHub

https://github.com/crate/crate/security/advisories/GHSA-2xv8-gjwh-fv8p

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-49989(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
io.crate:crate6.3.2

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 25× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-25 03:26 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-23 11:43 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-22 09:21 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-21 07:00 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-20 04:37 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-18 20:57 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-18 04:47 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-16 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-16 10:20 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-14 18:39 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-14 17:44 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-14 16:44 UTCEG score recompute 7.10
  24. 2026-08-14 16:44 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.1 · CVSS v4 → 7.1 · severity → HIGH
  25. 2026-08-01 12:10 UTCEG score recompute
Show 3 more
  1. 2026-07-26 13:14 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-23 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-01 20:02 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-49989?
CVE-2026-49989 is a high vulnerability published on July 1, 2026. CrateDB is a distributed SQL database. Prior to versions 6.2.8 and 6.3.2, any authenticated user can read or delete any blob whose SHA-1 digest they know, and can plant new blobs unconditionally, in any blob table, regardless of GRANTs. CrateDB has two ways to access blob storage: SQL (SELECT ...…
When was CVE-2026-49989 disclosed?
CVE-2026-49989 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 1, 2026, with the most recent update on August 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-49989 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-49989 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 81.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-49989?
CVE-2026-49989 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-49989?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-49989, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-49989

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-49989?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.