Probo is a self-hostable governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) platform built for engineering and security teams. Probo's saferedirect package validates redirect URLs used across authentication flows (OIDC, SAML, session transfer, OAuth connectors, and trust-center magic links). Prior to version 0.19.3.1, the validator only inspected the second character of relative paths, so a URL like /../\evil.com passed validation because the second character is .. Go's http.Redirect normalizes this path to /\evil.com before setting the Location header. Browsers can interpret the backslash as a host separator and redirect the user to an external domain (https://evil.com), bypassing the intended same-origin restriction. This enables open-redirect phishing: an attacker can craft a continue parameter (or embed a malicious URL in a session-transfer token) that appears to originate from a trusted Probo domain but redirects victims elsewhere. This is fixed in go.probo.inc/probo 0.193.1 by normalizing relative paths with path.Clean before validation, rejecting backslashes (including percent-encoded %5c) anywhere in the path, and re-checking the normalized result for protocol-relative and backslash prefixes. Self-hosted deployments should upgrade to probod v0.194.1 or later. SaaS deployments on getprobo.com are patched. No practical workaround is available for self-hosted installations.
CVE-2026-49820
This medium-severity CVE scores 4.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 79% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 4.7
- EG Score
- 4.7(medium)
- EG Risk
- 21(Track)EG Risk 21/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity47% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 21%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
June 30, 2026
Last Modified
August 14, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 13, 2026Open redirect bypass via path normalization · Advisory · getprobo/probo · GitHub
https://github.com/getprobo/probo/security/advisories/GHSA-x7qq-m748-8p2cprobo/SECURITY_NOTES.md at main · getprobo/probo · GitHub
https://github.com/getprobo/probo/blob/main/SECURITY_NOTES.mdVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-49820(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| go.probo.inc/probo | — | 0.204.0 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 14:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 18:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 22:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-24 12:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 10:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-22 08:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 07:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 18 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-20 05:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 01:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 00:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 19:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 18:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 15:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-30 23:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 13:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-30 19:31 UTCEG score recompute
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-49820?
When was CVE-2026-49820 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-49820 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-49820?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-49820?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-49820
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-49820?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.