Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. In versions prior to 1.7.18, the account-data trie syncers are vulnerable to a resource-exhaustion flaw that leaks bounded throttler slots on error paths. In syncDataTrie() (in both userAccountsSyncer.go and kappAccountsSyncer.go), StartProcessing() reserves a slot from the NumGoRoutinesThrottler, but the corresponding EndProcessing() is only called on the success path and on the duplicate-root early return. As a result, any error from trie.NewTrie(), trie.NewTrieSyncer(), or trieSyncer.StartSyncing() (including the network-dependent timeout path) permanently consumes one slot for the lifetime of the throttler. An attacker who can repeatedly cause trie-node sync failures or timeouts during bootstrap can exhaust the bounded throttler, after which further account-data trie syncs stop making progress and SyncAccounts() returns a timeout. Because epoch bootstrap in syncUserAccountsState() and syncKappAccountsState() aborts on any such error, this causes bootstrap to fail, a core availability issue affecting fresh, restarting, or resyncing nodes and validators. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.18.
CVE-2026-49343
This medium-severity CVE scores 5.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 82% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 5.9
- EG Score
- 5.9(medium)
- EG Risk
- 43(Track)EG Risk 43/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity59% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 18%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
June 5, 2026
Last Modified
August 13, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 7, 2026v1.7.18 - Coordinated Security Release
Patch available: klever-io/klever-go v1.7.18
https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/releases/tag/v1.7.18Throttler slot leak in trie account-data sync causes epoch bootstrap / state sync DoS · Advisory · klever-io/klever-go · GitHub
https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/security/advisories/GHSA-fw38-pc54-jvx9Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-49343(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/klever-io/klever-go | — | 1.7.18 | — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-23 12:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 12:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 09:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 01:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 19:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-13 19:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 18:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 01:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 01:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 00:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 00:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 10 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-09 00:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-07 23:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-31 05:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 21:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-49343?
When was CVE-2026-49343 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-49343 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-49343?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-49343?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-49343
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-49343?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.