CVE-2026-49121

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.1% (65th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory CVSS 8.1 is lower than this score; a lower GitHub score revises it only when its advisory is newer than the CVE record's last change, and this advisory (published 2026-06-01) is not newer than that change (2026-07-22), so it does not.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-33717 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.1%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).

AI Tensor Engine for ROCm (AITER) through 0.1.14 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the MessageQueue.recv() function within shm_broadcast.py that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending a malicious pickle payload to a ZMQ SUB socket with no authentication, HMAC, or format validation. Attackers who can reach the writer XPUB endpoint on the cluster network or supply a forged Handle with an attacker-controlled remote_subscribe_addr can deliver a crafted pickle payload that executes arbitrary code simultaneously as the inference worker process on every remote reader worker.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.
EPSS PROB
1.1%
EPSS %ILE
65th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
1.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-30). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 1, 2026

Last Modified

July 22, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Oct 18, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Fix referenced — no release confirmed yet. Sources: github_pr, redhat.
Web page🟡 PoC Available

[vulnerability] unauthenticated `pickle.loads` on TCP-bound ZMQ XPUB socket allows network RCE on ROCm inference workers · Issue #3076 · ROCm/aiter · GitHub

https://github.com/ROCm/aiter/issues/3076
Red Hat

2483882 – (CVE-2026-49121) CVE-2026-49121 aiter: AI Tensor Engine for ROCm (AITER): Remote Code Execution via Unauthenticated Pickle Deserialization

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2483882
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2026-49121 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-49121
Web page

AI Tensor Engine for ROCm (AITER) 0.1.14 Unauthenticated RCE via MessageQueue.recv() Pickle Deserialization | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/ai-tensor-engine-for-rocm-aiter-unauthenticated-rce-via-messagequeue-recv-pickle-deserialization
GitHub pull request

docs: add AITER May 2026 newsletter

Fix merged in ROCm/aiter PR #3170 on 2026-05-14 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/ROCm/aiter/pull/3170

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-49121(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 75× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 391 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 291 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-31 12:32 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-31 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  3. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-30 14:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  6. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  7. 2026-10-29 15:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  8. 2026-10-28 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-28 17:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  10. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  11. 2026-10-27 19:11 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-27 19:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  13. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  14. 2026-10-26 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-26 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  16. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  17. 2026-10-25 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-25 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  19. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  20. 2026-10-25 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-24 22:14 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-24 22:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  23. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  24. 2026-10-23 23:53 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-23 23:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  2. 2026-10-23 01:29 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-23 01:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  4. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  5. 2026-10-22 02:33 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-22 02:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  7. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  8. 2026-10-21 04:13 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-21 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  10. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  11. 2026-10-20 05:52 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-20 05:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  13. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  14. 2026-10-19 07:32 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-19 07:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  16. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  17. 2026-10-18 09:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  18. 2026-10-18 03:34 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  20. 2026-10-17 06:17 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 06:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  22. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 07:28 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-16 07:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  25. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 74th percentile
  26. 2026-10-15 06:21 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-15 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  28. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  29. 2026-10-14 02:02 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-14 02:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  31. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  32. 2026-10-12 22:21 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-12 22:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  34. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  35. 2026-10-12 16:00 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-10-12 07:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  37. 2026-10-11 19:43 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-11 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-10-11 14:22 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  41. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  42. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  43. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  44. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  45. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  46. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  47. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  48. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  49. 2026-10-03 13:39 UTCOSV refresh
  50. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  51. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  52. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  53. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  54. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  55. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
  56. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  57. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  58. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  59. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  60. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  61. 2026-09-14 06:01 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-14 06:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3qph-h85w-86qp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  63. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  64. 2026-09-13 00:06 UTCOSV refresh
  65. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  66. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  67. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  68. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  69. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  70. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  71. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  72. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  73. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
  74. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
  75. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-49121?
CVE-2026-49121 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 1, 2026. AI Tensor Engine for ROCm (AITER) through 0.1.14 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the MessageQueue.recv() function within shmbroadcast.py that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending a malicious pickle payload to a ZMQ SUB…
When was CVE-2026-49121 made public?
CVE-2026-49121 was made public on May 7, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on June 1, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 22, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-49121 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-49121 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (65th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-49121?
CVE-2026-49121 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-49121?
A fix for CVE-2026-49121 is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but EchelonGraph has no release containing it on record. Check that reference and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains the fix and update to it; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-49121 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-49121

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-49121?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.