joserfc is a Python library that provides an implementation of several JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) standards. In versions 1.3.4 through 1.6.5, joserfc accepts oversized RFC7797 b64=false JWS payloads without applying JWSRegistry.max_payload_length, which can lead to resource exhaustion. The normal JWS compact and flattened JSON paths reject payloads above the configured payload-size limit with ExceededSizeError. The RFC7797 unencoded payload paths do not make the same check. A valid b64=false compact or flattened JSON JWS can therefore deserialize successfully with a payload larger than JWSRegistry.max_payload_length. Applications that accept lower-trust JWS values and rely on joserfc to reject oversized token content during verification have a moderate availability risk. This issue has been fixed in version 1.6.7.
CVE-2026-48990
This medium-severity CVE scores 5.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 94% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 5.3(medium)
- EPSS
- 5.8%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
June 17, 2026
Last Modified
June 23, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Jun 17, 2026RFC7797 b64=false JWS payloads bypass JWSRegistry payload-size limits during deserialization · Advisory · authlib/joserfc · GitHub
https://github.com/authlib/joserfc/security/advisories/GHSA-wphv-vfrh-23q51.6.7
Patch available: authlib/joserfc 1.6.7
https://github.com/authlib/joserfc/releases/tag/1.6.7Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-48990(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | jaeger-main-2.19.0-1.hum1 | 2026-06-10 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 56× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-07 04:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-07 04:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-06 02:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 00:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-05 00:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-03 22:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-03 22:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-02 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-02 21:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-01 19:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-01 19:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 18:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-30 18:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-06-29 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-29 16:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 15:08 UTCEG score recompute
Show 31 moreShow fewer
- 2026-06-28 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 13:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-27 13:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-26 11:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 10:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 08:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 07:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-22 05:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 04:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-20 02:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-19 00:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-17 23:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-17 23:16 UTCNVD updatefirst tracked
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-400
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-48990?
When was CVE-2026-48990 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-48990 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48990?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48990?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-48990
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48990?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.