A flaw was found in GIMP. This issue is a heap buffer over-read in GIMP PCX file loader due to an off-by-one error. A remote attacker could exploit this by convincing a user to open a specially crafted PCX image. Successful exploitation could lead to out-of-bounds memory disclosure and a possible application crash, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
CVE-2026-4887
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (44th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory CVSS 6.1 is lower than this score; a lower GitHub score revises it only when its advisory is newer than the CVE record's last change, and this advisory (published 2026-03-26) is not newer than that change (2026-06-17), so it does not.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.1
- EG Score
- 7.1HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 32EG Risk 32/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity71% × 45%The EG Score, 7.1 of 10.Exploitation0.5% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 44th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
March 26, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated May 14, 2026(CVE-2026-4887) Heap buffer overflow read in PCX file loader due to off-by-one in bytesperline validation (#15960) · Issues · GNOME / GIMP · GitLab
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/issues/159602451669 – (CVE-2026-4887) CVE-2026-4887 gimp: GIMP:Memory disclosure and denial of service via specially crafted PCX image
Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451669Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17533Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16484Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-4887(12)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:26168Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: gimp security update
- RHSA-2026:25901Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: gimp security update
- RHSA-2026:25907Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: gimp security update
- RHSA-2026:25899Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: gimp security update
- RHSA-2026:20691Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: gimp security update
- RHSA-2026:20554Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: gimp:2.8 security update
- RHSA-2026:20552Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: gimp:2.8 security update
- RHSA-2026:20553Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: gimp:2.8 security update
- +4 more
Patch Availability(11)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | gimp-2:2.8.22-1.el7_9.6 | 2026-06-16 | redhat |
| redhat | gimp-2:2.99.8-4.el9_6.7 | 2026-06-15 | redhat |
| redhat | gimp-2:2.99.8-4.el9_4.6 | 2026-06-15 | redhat |
| redhat | gimp-2:2.99.8-4.el9_2.6 | 2026-06-15 | redhat |
| redhat | gimp:2.8-8040020260520140422.70584597 | 2026-05-26 | redhat |
| redhat | gimp:2.8-8080020260520102644.0621e4ee | 2026-05-26 | redhat |
| redhat | gimp-2:2.99.8-3.el9_0.6 | 2026-05-26 | redhat |
| redhat | gimp:2.8-8060020260520140100.6af1eaf0 | 2026-05-26 | redhat |
| redhat | gimp-2:3.0.4-4.el9_8.4 | 2026-05-19 | redhat |
| redhat | gimp:2.8-8100020260512115927.4c9c024f | 2026-05-14 | redhat |
| redhat | gimp-2:3.0.4-1.el9_7.5 | 2026-05-12 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gimp | 2.10.22-4 ... 3.2.4-3 (61 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gimp | 2.10.34-1 ... 3.2.6-1 (57 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gimp | 3.0.4-3 ... 3.2.6-1 (31 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gimp | 3.0.4-3 ... 3.2.0~RC3-1 (14 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 220 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 120 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-11 05:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-21 17:19 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-02 13:57 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-16 10:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 10:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 10:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wmqx-rmqw-vxp8 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-14 19:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 19:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wmqx-rmqw-vxp8 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-14 06:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 06:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 06:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wmqx-rmqw-vxp8 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-12 20:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wmqx-rmqw-vxp8 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-11 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wmqx-rmqw-vxp8 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-11 03:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 03:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 03:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wmqx-rmqw-vxp8 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-10 08:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 08:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wmqx-rmqw-vxp8 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-09 19:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 19:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 19:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wmqx-rmqw-vxp8 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-09 06:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 06:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 06:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wmqx-rmqw-vxp8 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-08 05:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 05:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 05:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wmqx-rmqw-vxp8 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wmqx-rmqw-vxp8 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-06 18:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 18:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 18:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wmqx-rmqw-vxp8 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-06 00:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 00:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wmqx-rmqw-vxp8 · GitHub CVSS 6.1
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-03 23:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-03 23:18 UTCVendor advisory
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:11:gimp
- CVE-2010-4541EG 9.3EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2009-3909EG 9.3EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2009-1570EG 9.3EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2018-12713EG 9.1CRITICAL
- CVE-2023-44443NVD 7.8EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-2044EG 8.8HIGH
- CVE-2026-0797EG 8.8HIGH
- CVE-2025-5473EG 8.8EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2023-44442NVD 7.8EG 8.5EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2023-44444NVD 7.8EG 8.4EPSS p99HIGH
Same vendor
5 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:16484
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-4887?
When was CVE-2026-4887 made public?
Is CVE-2026-4887 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-4887?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-4887?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-4887
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-4887?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.