CVE-2026-48702

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 74% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Rekor is a software supply chain transparency log. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.5.2, the Package.Unmarshal() function in pkg/types/alpine/apk.go decompresses the signature and control gzip members of an APK file into in-memory buffers without bounding the total decompressed size. The existing max_apk_metadata_size check (default 1MB) is only applied to individual tar entry header sizes after decompression completes, so it does not prevent a decompression bomb from consuming unbounded heap memory. An attacker can craft a gzip stream that compresses at a ~1000:1 ratio (e.g., 2MB compressed zeros → 2GB decompressed). When submitted as spec.package.content in an Alpine ProposedEntry, the server decompresses the full payload into memory during request processing, triggering a fatal Go runtime out-of-memory error or OS OOM-kill that cannot be caught by the server's recover() middleware. This is reachable via two unauthenticated endpoints, POST /api/v1/log/entries (createLogEntry) and POST /api/v1/log/entries/retrieve (searchLogQuery). Both invoke V001Entry.Canonicalize() → fetchExternalEntities() → apk.Unmarshal(packageData), which performs the unbounded decompression. Version 1.5.2 patches the issue. There is no effective workaround. Setting max_request_body_size reduces but does not eliminate exposure due to the ~1000:1 compression ratio (a 1MB body limit still allows ~1GB heap allocation). Setting max_apk_metadata_size has no effect on this vulnerability since the check is applied after decompression.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
37th
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Aug 13, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
github Patch Available

OOM condition due to Unbounded gzip decompression in Alpine APK parsing · Advisory · sigstore/rekor · GitHub

https://github.com/sigstore/rekor/security/advisories/GHSA-47q9-m4ww-924m

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhtas/rekor-server-rhel9:17873053972026-08-25redhat
redhatrhtas/rekor-server-rhel9:17853915242026-08-05redhat
redhattrivy-main-0.72.0-0.1.hum12026-07-02redhat
redhatcosign-main-3.1.1-0.1.hum12026-06-10redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rekor1.3.10-1 ... 1.5.3-2 (10 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rekor1.3.10-1 ... 1.5.1-1 (7 versions)
  • every version up to 1.5.2-1: fixed in 1.5.2-1
—
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/sigstore/rekor—
  • 0.3.0 up to 1.5.2: fixed in 1.5.2
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 135 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-23 08:25 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-23 08:25 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-18 20:11 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-18 20:11 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-18 07:19 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-18 07:19 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-14 01:17 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-14 01:17 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-13 09:37 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-12 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-12 15:42 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-30 19:29 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-30 19:29 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-27 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-27 23:16 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-25 00:46 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-25 00:46 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-24 13:08 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-24 13:08 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-23 21:12 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-23 09:47 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-23 09:47 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-22 22:20 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-22 09:56 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-22 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-21 17:25 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-21 05:53 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-08-21 05:53 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-20 18:27 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-20 07:01 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-20 07:01 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-19 12:39 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-19 01:13 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-19 01:13 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-17 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-17 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-17 00:39 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-08-16 13:13 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-16 13:13 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-16 01:47 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-15 14:21 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-15 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-15 02:55 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-08-14 15:29 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-14 04:04 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-13 16:38 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-13 16:38 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-13 15:35 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-13 15:35 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-13 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-13 14:26 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-13 13:57 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-13 07:48 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-12 20:22 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-12 08:57 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-11 21:32 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-11 10:07 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-10 22:41 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-10 11:16 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-09 23:50 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-09 12:25 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-09 00:59 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-48702?
CVE-2026-48702 is a high vulnerability published on June 25, 2026. Rekor is a software supply chain transparency log. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.5.2, the Package.Unmarshal() function in pkg/types/alpine/apk.go decompresses the signature and control gzip members of an APK file into in-memory buffers without bounding the total decompressed…
When was CVE-2026-48702 disclosed?
CVE-2026-48702 was first published on June 25, 2026, with the most recent update on September 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-48702 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-48702 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (37th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48702?
CVE-2026-48702 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48702?
A fix for CVE-2026-48702 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-48702 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-48702

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48702?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.