Rekor is a software supply chain transparency log. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.5.2, the Package.Unmarshal() function in pkg/types/alpine/apk.go decompresses the signature and control gzip members of an APK file into in-memory buffers without bounding the total decompressed size. The existing max_apk_metadata_size check (default 1MB) is only applied to individual tar entry header sizes after decompression completes, so it does not prevent a decompression bomb from consuming unbounded heap memory. An attacker can craft a gzip stream that compresses at a ~1000:1 ratio (e.g., 2MB compressed zeros → 2GB decompressed). When submitted as spec.package.content in an Alpine ProposedEntry, the server decompresses the full payload into memory during request processing, triggering a fatal Go runtime out-of-memory error or OS OOM-kill that cannot be caught by the server's recover() middleware. This is reachable via two unauthenticated endpoints, POST /api/v1/log/entries (createLogEntry) and POST /api/v1/log/entries/retrieve (searchLogQuery). Both invoke V001Entry.Canonicalize() → fetchExternalEntities() → apk.Unmarshal(packageData), which performs the unbounded decompression. Version 1.5.2 patches the issue. There is no effective workaround. Setting max_request_body_size reduces but does not eliminate exposure due to the ~1000:1 compression ratio (a 1MB body limit still allows ~1GB heap allocation). Setting max_apk_metadata_size has no effect on this vulnerability since the check is applied after decompression.
CVE-2026-48702
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5%, top 62% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(medium)
- EG Risk
- 49(Track)EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 38%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
June 25, 2026
Last Modified
August 13, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Aug 13, 2026OOM condition due to Unbounded gzip decompression in Alpine APK parsing · Advisory · sigstore/rekor · GitHub
https://github.com/sigstore/rekor/security/advisories/GHSA-47q9-m4ww-924mVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-48702(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:50873Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHTAS 1.4.3 - Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer Release
- GHSA-47q9-m4ww-924mGitHub Security AdvisoriesHigh
Rekor has an OOM Condition due to Unbounded gzip Decompression in Alpine APK Parsing Logic
- RHSA-2026:25138Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhtas/rekor-server-rhel9:1785391524 | 2026-08-05 | redhat |
| redhat | cosign-main-3.1.1-0.1.hum1 | 2026-06-10 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rekor | 1.3.10-1 ... 1.5.2-1 (8 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rekor | 1.3.10-1 ... 1.5.1-1 (7 versions) | 1.5.2-1 | — |
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/sigstore/rekor | — | 1.5.2 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 72× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-21 05:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 05:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 18:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 07:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 07:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 12:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 01:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 01:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 00:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 13:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 13:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 01:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 14:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 02:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 15:29 UTCVendor advisory
Show 53 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-14 04:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 16:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 16:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 15:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 15:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 14:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 13:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 07:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 20:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 08:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 21:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 10:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 22:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 11:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 23:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 12:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 00:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 13:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 14:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 03:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 15:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 04:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-05 17:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-04 22:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-04 08:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-03 20:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-03 09:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-02 22:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-02 10:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-01 23:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-01 11:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-01 00:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-31 12:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-31 01:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-30 13:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-30 13:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-30 00:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-29 08:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-28 20:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-28 05:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-27 17:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-27 02:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-23 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-16 23:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-16 11:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-16 00:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-15 13:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-15 01:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-06-25 21:46 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat
- CVE-2001-0825EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2001-1009EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2001-0554EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2001-1162EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0414EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2001-0191EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2001-0301EG 10.0EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2001-0197EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0233EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0010EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-770
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-48702?
When was CVE-2026-48702 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-48702 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48702?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48702?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-48702
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48702?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.