OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.2, the registration handler at POST /api/auth/register/{userId} validates the relationship between the WebAuthn challenge and the registration cookie's email but never validates that the userId in the URL belongs to that email. An unauthenticated attacker requests a challenge for their own email, generates a registration response with their own authenticator, and submits it against any victim user's URL. The challenge-vs-cookie email match passes, the WebAuthn ceremony validates, and addPasskey writes the attacker's credential into the victim's user_passkey rows. The next victim-email login accepts a passkey assertion from the attacker's authenticator and issues a session as the victim. User IDs are not strictly secret on this platform, but the exact set of exposure surfaces should be assessed by the maintainers. Staff-list endpoints return user IDs to authenticated tenant members per the route signature; live verification of all exposure surfaces (whether user IDs leak through any unauthenticated route, through invite-confirmation URLs, or through other administrative views) is part of the pending live PoC. Where the attacker knows the victim's email and userId, the analysis below becomes account takeover. Version 1.0.2 fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-48087
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (45th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 75EG Risk 75/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 45th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 6, 2026
Last Modified
September 8, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 14, 2026WebAuthn passkey injection allows account takeover · Advisory · open-reception/appointment-booking-software · GitHub
https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-j9rw-x2wv-h5rjcommit 5f61a2116d68 (open-reception/appointment-booking-software)
Patch available: open-reception/appointment-booking-software v1.0.2 (contains commit 5f61a2116d68)
https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/5f61a2116d68378366edd712c343a9de7b205a74Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 117 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 17 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-14 08:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-13 05:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-06 23:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-05 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-05 08:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-04 05:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-03 01:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 09:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-30 22:58 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-29 05:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-27 17:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-25 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-22 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 00:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 17:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 22:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-18 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 00:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-16 07:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-15 06:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-12 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 12:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-09 06:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-07 17:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-06 16:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-05 16:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 17:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 09:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-03 06:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-01 17:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-01 07:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 22:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-30 05:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-29 10:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-27 19:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-26 15:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-25 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-24 17:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 09:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-22 00:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-20 23:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-19 18:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-18 17:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-17 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-16 15:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-16 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-15 02:32 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-287
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-48087?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-48087 published?
Is CVE-2026-48087 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48087?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48087?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-48087
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48087?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.