OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. The new-client booking flow in versions 1.0.1 and prior consists of three calls: bootstrap-challenge (returns a 16-bit PoW challenge with difficulty=4 leading hex zeroes), bootstrap-verify (validates the PoW and issues a Bearer booking access token), and create-new-client (consumes the token and creates the tunnel and first appointment). The token correctly binds to tenantId, tunnelId, clientPublicKey, and emailHash, but never to channelId. The bootstrap-challenge request schema does not even accept a channelId, and the issued token's payload contains no channel information. Independently, the service function createNewClientWithAppointment checks only channel.archived = false. The channel.isPublic check that protects addAppointmentToTunnel is missing in the new-client path. The combination means: an attacker completes the bootstrap flow normally (16-bit PoW, completes in well under one second on commodity hardware, no rate limiting beyond the throttle store), receives a valid booking access token, and then submits the create-new-client payload with channelId pointing to a private (isPublic = false) channel. The booking lands as CONFIRMED if the target channel has requiresConfirmation = false (the default), otherwise as NEW. The patient-facing UI does not list private channels in its picker (/api/public/channels correctly filters isPublic = true), so the channel ID must be obtained out of band. The companion finding V-10 (schedule endpoint discloses private channels) provides exactly that: a single unauthenticated GET reveals every private channel ID for any tenant. V-10 plus V-11 together make private channels fully reachable to anonymous attackers. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available.
CVE-2026-48076
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 85% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5(medium)
- EG Risk
- 60(Attend)EG Risk 60/100SSVC: Attend
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity65% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 15%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 6, 2026
Last Modified
August 7, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Aug 6, 2026bootstrap booking flow allows unauthenticated booking on isPublic=false channels · Advisory · open-reception/appointment-booking-software · GitHub
https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-3658-3j75-p5j3Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 01:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 00:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 00:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-24 23:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 23:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-22 22:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 22:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 20:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 20:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 19:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 17 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-15 19:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 18:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 17:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 17:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-09 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 15:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-07 15:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-07 14:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 22:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 22:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 22:15 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-48076?
When was CVE-2026-48076 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-48076 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48076?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48076?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-48076
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48076?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.