CVE-2026-47724

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.99.9
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.9 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.0%, top 93% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m, epss
9.9
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 9.9Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

nebula-mesh: API endpoints lack ownership checks, enabling cross-operator privilege escalation

The /api/v1/* route surface trusts the bearer token alone for authorisation on most endpoints. The codebase itself admits this at internal/api/hosts.go:384: *"API trusts the bearer token for authorisation; per-CA ownership is enforced only in the Web layer."*

The Web UI gates state-changing routes through loadAccessibleCA (internal/web/cas.go); CA-management endpoints in internal/api/cas.go ALSO have proper canAccessCA gates. The gap is on the host, network, firewall, mobile-bundle, and most operator endpoints. Combined with the per-operator CA model from ADR 0002, this gives any non-admin operator API key broad cross-tenant access — instant privilege escalation in the worst case.

Affected

All released versions prior to v0.3.4.

Exploit chain

A) Mint admin API key from any operator key (instant privilege escalation)

internal/api/operators.go:118handleCreateOperatorAPIKey does no admin check and no actor/target-operator ownership check. Any operator key can call it for any operator (including admins) and receive a fresh bearer.

curl -X POST -H "Authorization: Bearer " \
  https://server/api/v1/operators//api-keys \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"name":"oops"}'

Returns: {"key":"<32-byte admin bearer>","entry":{...}}

Reuse the returned key for subsequent requests → full admin.

B) Cross-operator host takeover via reenroll

internal/api/hosts.go:321,330mintEnrollmentTokenForHost. Looks up host by URL param, mints a single-use enrollment token, returns it. No ownership check.

curl -X POST -H "Authorization: Bearer " \
  https://server/api/v1/hosts//reenroll

Returns: {"enrollment_token":"",...}

Caller POSTs /api/v1/enroll with their own X25519 + Ed25519 keypairs. enroll.go:175 overwrites signing_pub_pem; SaveCertificateAndEnrollHost overwrites the cert. Legitimate agent's next signed poll fails bad_signature. Attacker now owns the victim's Nebula identity.

C) Cross-tenant CRUD on hosts, networks, firewall

The same gap applies across:
  • /api/v1/hosts* — create, list, get, update, delete, block, unblock
  • /api/v1/networks* — create, list, get
  • /api/v1/networks/{id}/firewall — get, PUT
  • /api/v1/hosts/{id}/mobile-bundle (already filed as public issue #119)

All trust bearer-auth alone. Any operator can read or mutate any other operator's resources.

Affected operator-management handlers (in addition to A)

Beyond handleCreateOperatorAPIKey (covered by A), internal/api/operators.go is missing admin gates on:
  • handleListOperators (line 66) — operator roster info disclosure
  • handleDisableOperator (line 79) — DoS / sabotage
  • handleEnableOperator (line 94) — re-enable disabled operators
  • handleRevokeOperatorAPIKey (line 157) — invalidate any operator's API keys
  • handleListOperatorAPIKeys (line 173) — API-key metadata disclosure

handleCreateOperator (line 26) IS properly gated (actorIsAdmin at line 27).

NOT affected (verified)

internal/api/cas.go properly gates every CA endpoint via canAccessCA (calls at lines 70, 176, 216) and admin shortcuts at lines 39, 82. An earlier description draft mistakenly listed /api/v1/cas/{id}/rotate as affected — that endpoint is properly protected. CAs are not in this gap.

Impact

  • Any non-admin operator → admin via one curl (A).
  • Any non-admin operator → ownership of any victim's hosts with cert + identity transfer (B).
  • Mass cross-tenant CRUD including firewall-rule mutation (C).
  • Any operator → disable/enable other operators, revoke their API keys, enumerate the operator roster.

CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H — 9.6.

Suggested fix

Shared helpers in a new internal/api/authz.go, mirroring the Web layer's loadAccessibleCA:

func (s *Server) requireAdmin(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) bool
func (s *Server) requireOperatorAccess(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, operatorID string) bool
func (s *Server) requireHostAccess(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, hostID string) (*models.Host, bool)
func (s *Server) requireNetworkAccess(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, networkID string) (*models.Network, bool)

Each loads the resource, resolves its CA via *.CAID, accepts if actorIsAdmin(ctx) OR actor owns the CA. Reject 403 forbidden; audit-log api..forbidden with the reason.

The operator-management endpoints take requireAdmin instead (operator ownership doesn't map to CA ownership).

Apply at the top of every host-, network-, firewall-, mobile-bundle-touching API handler, plus the 5 operator endpoints listed above. The legacy config-key path retains admin (preserves backward compatibility); the broader legacy-fallback question is tracked separately as issue #121.

Test matrix

  • admin → all operations permitted
  • owning non-admin → operations on owned hosts/networks permitted
  • non-owner non-admin → 403 + audit entry
  • legacy config-key → preserved (admin)
  • unauthenticated → existing 401 from middleware

Coordinated context

Subsumes public issue #119 (mobile-bundle authz). Issue #121 (actor.go:40 legacy-admin fallback) is a separate concern tracked independently.

CVSS v3
9.9
EG Score
9.9(low)
EPSS
7.3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 8, 2026

Last Modified

June 8, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-47724(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
github.com/juev/nebula-mesh0.3.4

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 26× in last 7d / 150× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 150 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-06 01:38 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-05 21:52 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-05 17:16 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-05 00:53 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-04 20:06 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-07-04 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-03 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-03 19:56 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-03 16:09 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-07-03 09:21 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-07-03 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-07-02 21:57 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-07-02 18:10 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-07-02 14:02 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-07-02 10:15 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-07-02 06:29 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-07-02 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-07-01 22:56 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-07-01 18:54 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-01 15:08 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-01 11:16 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-07-01 07:30 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-07-01 03:44 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-06-30 23:58 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-06-30 20:11 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-06-30 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-06-30 07:20 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-06-30 02:49 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-06-29 23:02 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-06-29 19:14 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-06-29 15:01 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-06-29 11:15 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-06-29 07:29 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-06-29 01:52 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-06-28 22:06 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-06-28 18:19 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-06-28 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-06-28 10:31 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-06-28 06:28 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-06-28 02:33 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-06-27 22:46 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-06-27 19:00 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-06-27 15:14 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-06-27 11:27 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-06-27 07:37 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-06-27 03:50 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-06-27 00:04 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-06-26 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-06-26 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-06-26 12:44 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-06-26 04:39 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-06-26 00:52 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-06-25 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-06-25 16:38 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-06-25 12:51 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-06-25 09:04 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-06-25 05:18 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-06-25 00:58 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-06-24 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-06-24 14:10 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-06-24 08:04 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-06-24 03:37 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-06-23 23:46 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-06-23 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-06-23 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-06-23 02:28 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-06-22 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-06-22 13:46 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-06-22 05:40 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-06-21 19:41 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-06-21 10:54 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-06-21 05:49 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-06-21 02:00 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-06-20 21:49 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-06-20 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-06-20 11:39 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-06-20 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-06-20 03:06 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-06-19 23:13 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-06-19 18:37 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-06-19 13:57 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-06-19 09:58 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-06-19 04:25 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-06-19 00:37 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-06-18 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-06-18 16:02 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-06-18 11:46 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-06-18 07:21 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-06-18 03:21 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-06-17 23:29 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-06-17 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-06-17 15:46 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-06-17 11:56 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-06-17 08:10 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-06-17 04:23 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-06-17 00:37 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-06-16 20:51 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-06-16 17:05 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-06-16 13:19 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-06-16 09:25 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-47724?
CVE-2026-47724 is a critical vulnerability published on June 8, 2026. nebula-mesh: API endpoints lack ownership checks, enabling cross-operator privilege escalation The /api/v1/ route surface trusts the bearer token alone for authorisation on most endpoints. The codebase itself admits this at internal/api/hosts.go:384: "API trusts the bearer token for authorisation;…
When was CVE-2026-47724 disclosed?
CVE-2026-47724 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-47724 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-47724 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 7.3% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-47724?
CVE-2026-47724 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 9.9 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-47724?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-47724, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-47724

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-47724?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.